Bannon, Fuentes and the Trump Presidency

Fake Debate Goes Hand in Hand with Fake News

The scale and speed of the Trump triumph on Election Day gave the new President a platform on which take a bow with his large family after several prominent media venues had officially declared his victory early in the morning of November 6. Many key figures in the Trump Team shared in the glory of the moment. Steve Bannon was prominent among them.

Bannon had walked out of the jail in Dandbury Connecticut on October 29, one week before the presidential election. He gained his freedom in time to take over the helm of his War Room broadcast platform

Reuters explained that one of the President Elect’s “most prominent cheer leaders” had served a 120 day sentence for a misdemeanor described as “contempt of Congress.” Bannon’s own position was that he was “finally out of being a political prisoner by the Merrick Garland, Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi regime."

https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-ally-steve-bannon-is-released-prison-after-serving-contempt-sentence-2024-10-29/

I was drawn into the whirlwind of media activism generated by Steve Bannon after the presidential election of 2020. Often with Chinese dissident Guo Wengui as his sidekick, Bannon held forth in the early days of the War Room on a variety of subjects starting with the steal of the 2020 election. The topic of the election rigging in 2020-21 came up prominently in Bannon’s commentary in the War Room telecast on November 5, but especially after it became clear Trump was going to win.

The main topic of Bannon’s daily shows in late 2019 and early 2020 soon merged into his investigations of the early stages of the developing reign of the celebrity virus that was about to take the world by storm. COVID-19!

As many will remember, China was the main site of the coverage of the “new” disease said to be spreading in our midst. Much intended panic and hysteria was thereby generated.

The geography of the largely manufactured crisis provided an opening for Steve and Miles Guo (aka Gu Wengui) to elaborate their views on the real or imagined crimes of the Chinese Communist Party against its own people.

Putting aside the disparity between the official narrative and the evidence-based account of the election fraud and the slew of COVID-19 deceptions, Bannon provided his audience with a platform to look skeptically at what was happening around us. From late 2019 onwards, much of humanity has been enwrapped in a thick web of pre-planned and intertwined hoaxes delivered from above by a well-organized supranational crime cartel.

Of course power grabs are nothing new in history. But the initiation of this global power grab with the dissemination of a bioweapon disguised as a remedy for a catastrophic public health crisis, has proven to be a very effective means for setting in motion a complex of extremely grave assaults on the human species. The injections were not safe but they certainly have been effective at killing and enfeebling people.

It is as if our Lords and Masters have decided to put everything on the line to tighten the grip of their domination over even the survivors of their many-faceted war on humanity.

Fake News? Fake Debate?

Before setting aside considerable time for watching Steve Bannon’s War Room, I had not taken Donald Trump and what he represents very seriously. I did notice, however, that with his rallies in the rust belt regions of America, Trump seemed to manifest some real concern for working class people in America. I didn’t see anything like this concern for suffering Americans in the political programs of Trump’s political opponents.

Moreover, I loved it when Trump would point at the dullard, robotized, bought-and-paid-for figures in MSM and describe them collectively as “fake news.” This seemed to be a fitting response to the dependence of lazy journalists on the overused phrases, conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists.

Bannon caused me to look harder and more deeply into the Donald Trump phenomenon. As I started to try to put him in historical context, it seems to me he was building on the populist platform whose foundations were laid by Alex Jones.

With Bannon’s background in the military, high finance, motion pictures and journalism, he brought many important insights to his analysis as host of a regular TV show.

One realization, however, opened up something of a pandora’s box for me. Bannon’s punditry could be seen as a marker of the vitality of democratic discourse in America. His assertive and well-informed style of debating with Democratic Party people leaves the impression that the system works; that both sides of the political spectrum are engaged in energetic combat worthy of being taken seriously.

But all in all, throughout all the animated exchanges that take place, one enormous subject never seems to come up for extended critical examination. That subject is the oversized role of Zionism, Israel and Jews in Congress, in the White House, in media, in high finance, in entertainment and in the academic precincts of the United States.

I find something quite obscene in the American propensity to ignore that there is something missing in the exchanges of political contenders who put on heavily animated shows of disagreeing on a vast array of subjects. Most often they do not, however, acknowledge that they are all paid, directed, and subjugated by the same paymasters and gate keepers.

Fake news has its counterpart in fake debate. Steven Bannon, a former founder and top executive of Breitbart News, is a telling example of a phenomenon that makes a lie of so much of what he and Donald Trump claim to stand for.

This latest presidential campaign illustrated the deep internal corruption of Zionist-dominated politics in the United States. As in many countries, a large constituency of decent-minded Americans, including Jews, organized against the obscenity of the ongoing campaign of genocide pushed on the predominately civilian populations in Gaza, the West Bank and now Lebanon.

Law-abiding citizens in all the Western countries have tried to push back on the criminal actions of our governments but no mainstream political parties will represent our political will. When it comes to such basic life-and-death issues, our so-called democracies are shams. Harsh consequences can be expected for pointing to the overriding role of Zionist heavy weights in deciding the major outlines of how society operates.

In Canada the leader of His Majesties Official Opposition Party, Pierre Poilievre, is a more avid champion of the Israel genocide in Gaza than the pathetic leadership of the ruling Liberal and NDP parties.

In the United States former President Biden and President Elect Trump have for a year now been trying to outdo one another in making promises to back up the kill-lust of Bibi Netanyahu’s international criminal government. How did it come to be that there is no obstacle to block the $100,000,000 contribution to Trump from Miriam Adelson in order to advance the policies of a foreign government.

After Receiving $100,000,000 from Miriam Adelson to Sell Off More of Palestine to Israel, Trump Bestows the “Medal of Freedom” Award

The list of anomalies goes on and on. Even Robert F. Kennedy, the most substantial third-party candidate I can remember in the United States, goes along with the prevailing subservience to the Zionist system of command and control. Kennedy handed over his campaign to the Zionist cabal that is making a farce of the concept that US democracy has survived the oppressive era of the ubiquitous Israel Lobby.

Saying the Unsayable

These days I’m paying attention to a persistent and usually reasonable voice pointing consistently to the proverbial elephant in the US command centre of hard and soft power. His name is Nicholas Fuentes. Fuentes will be well known to some. Inevitably what Fuentes is doing and saying makes him the object of numerous smear pieces, including in the notoriously Zionist publication, Wikipedia.

A Younger Nick Fuentes Campaigning for Trump

Fuentes is a young adult who seems wise before his age. He has been stripped down and punished for numerous crimes, mostly having to do with criticizing a certain tribe who are not supposed to be criticized. How many more layers of legal protection must be heaped on this chosen people to shield them from supposed “antisemitism” and “Holocaust Denial.”

Fuentes was one of those persecuted in many ways for being at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021. His experiences, like those of many others who responded critically to the obvious election fraud of 2021, exemplifies the vicious tyranny of the Biden regime. Bannon took on this subject assertively on election night.

Fuentes came of age politically in the circle of anti-authoritarian protagonists who formed Donald Trump’s entourage in the 2015 presidential campaign. He greatly admires the guts and gusto of Trump when he was a fledgling presidential candidate. Fuentes continues to speak of Trump with genuine affection and respect for many of the ideals he embodies.

But Fuentes became extremely disappointed by Trump’s performance in the Oval Office. This disappointment only increased after Trump was out of office. Nick Fuentes explains his assessment of Trump’s performance in the video below, which he recorded on the eve of November 5.

I have to say that I wince at certain phrases that come from Fuentes’ mouth from time to time. But some of his comments come to seem less extreme to me as I subsequently mull them over.

I have come to see that this young political commentator is saying so many things that need to be said. Most often, however, this genre of speaking truth to power cannot come through loud and clear because of the intimidation, repression, deplatforming, censorship and worse.

As I see it, Fuentes should be given lots of latitude to put together all the components of the big picture as he sees fit. Like him or hate him, Fuentes is a voice that effectively captures some of the major political choices of these times. His side of the arguments, however, rarely have the chance of being heard on platforms such as his. Given the growing prohibition on free speech, such a platform must have been very difficult to construct and maintain.

As his body of commentaries show, Nick Fuentes explains himself again and again in perfect prose delivered with grace and poise seemingly extemporaneously.

To View Click Here

https://rumble.com/v5m2jfh-why-im-not-voting-for-trump.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

To View Click Here

https://rumble.com/v5m2jfh-why-im-not-voting-for-trump.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp