Looking out at the World from Canada is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
The popular Scottish pundit, Neil Oliver, has reflected with great anguish on the lies and crimes attending the genocidal impact of the bioweapons that were fraudulently advertised as a means of stopping the spread of COVID-19. In his commentary on a building storm of legitimate public anger taking shape worldwide, Oliver highlighted prominently the sordid mess unfolding in Canada.
Oliver’s very precise observations and explanations deserve a lengthy citation.
“I think a lot about Canada, the unlikeliest centre of totalitarianism that a person born and raised in the West could contemplate. In Canada more and more people are aware of, and righteously furious about, what their Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau and his political allies have been up to and are up to.
They are still in the aftermath of the Truckers’ Protest, much though there is an effort to sweep it under the carpet. It is the Truckers’ Protest that saw the Emergency Act brought down like a cudgel on the heads of those protesting the experimental gene alterations that were pushed as vaccines by the Trudeau government and other governments all around the world.
In many places the experimental gene alterations were mandated. All over the place people had to take the jabs in order to keep their jobs. And those who wouldn’t take the jabs often lost their jobs. And if that isn’t “mandated” I don’t know what is.
But in Canada the Emergency Act enabled the freezing of bank accounts and the imprisonment of protesters, peaceful protesters, who were rounded up and labelled right-wing protesters, right next door to “domestic terrorists,” for that protest.
The so-called Coutts Four, that’s four Canadian men who were held on remand in little more than cages without bail or due process for, at this moment, 740 days and counting.”
As did Tucker Carlson, Oliver included mention of the Coutts Four fiasco, now the Coutts Two fiasco. This debacle of the concerted abuse of political prisoners in Canada provides a good illustration of the new “totalitarianism” taking hold of the huge Commonwealth country encompassing northern North America.
The term, “the Coutts Four,” refers to four men selected haphazardly from the Freedom Convoy protesters that gathered at a Montana-Alberta border crossing south of Lethbridge.
The Coutts Four were entrapped to face extravagantly trumped up charges. The Crown prosector accused the four members of the Freedom Convoy protest at Coutts Alberta of conspiring together with the intention of killing Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers. The RCMP, the Trudeau government as well as its captive media went further, much further.
In the trial by media conducted concurrently with the so-called “pre-trial” processes in the Lethbridge Court House, the case is being developed that the would-be cop killers seek to join with others in violently overthrowing the government of Canada and possibly that of the United States as well. Soon after their arrests the maltreatment of the Coutts Four was being compared with the malevolence pointed at the January 6 protestors at the Capitol in Washington DC.
In four distinct procedures, each of the four men were denied bail. They were kept in jail in substandard remand cages for over two years having been convicted of nothing. While being incarcerated the four men faced round after round of weird and unorthodox “pre-trail proceedings.” The initial scheme, it seems, was to prepare the ground for some sort of political show trial aimed at persecuting the imagined antithesis of the woke authoritarianism embraced by the Freeland-Trudeau duo.
Then in February of 2024 the Crown withdrew the conspiracy-to-kill-cops charges from two of the four men. The two individuals plea bargained their way out of the remand cages where their harsh and sometimes ruthless treatment definitely placed them under severe duress. While two of the Coutts Four are now free, the other two men are still facing a continuation of the dubious “pre-trail” procedures.
The heavily politicized Crown Prosecutor, Stephen Johnston, has yet to explain how the conspiracy-to-commit-murder charges aimed at the Coutts Four could just fade away into nothingness for half the men, but continue to apply without alteration to the other two individuals.
How can such a fundamental change of conditions not be reflected in the narrative used to explain the continuing incarceration and forthcoming trial of Chis Carbert and Anthony Olienick? Surely Crown officials owe Canadians some sort of explanation of the growing number of anomalies in such an expensive and high-profile case.
But who in power makes themselves accountable these days unless they are forced to do so. When the media and the bourgeoning police state combine to deceive the public, what recourse is left in a matter such as this one?
Who came up with the idea of subjecting the Coutts Four to a trial dealing with the murder of RCMP officers when no Mounties were killed?
What is to be said of assigning the RCMP the task of creating the evidentiary basis to prove the existence of a supposed plot to murder their own members. Isn’t there a fundamental conflict of interest at play in such a bizarre procedure?
As the testimony of the former police officer indicates below, a significant portion of Canadians view the RCMP as a failed police force notorious for letting high-level crimes proliferate especially in and around the Office of notoriously corrupt Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau. For years now he has been awash in scandal after scandal left basically uninvestigated by the opportunistic politicians in charge of the RCMP.
The testimonial below indicates that 45 of the scandals involving legal violations by Prime Minister Trudeau should, if properly assessed, rise to the level of criminal charges. Meanwhile in case after case, including, for instance, the RCMP’s role in manufacturing a “terrorist” bombing threat in Victoria in 2013, the RCMP prostitute their policing role to create theatrical performances aimed at advancing the interests of their political masters.
The RCMP’s role in the case of Coutts Four has a similar resonance to the pressure cooker bomb fiasco attributed to two entrapped Muslims. The Mounties regularly ignore crimes at the highest levels that are hugely destructive to Canada’s viability. Concurrently the RCMP played along with the Trudeau government in 2022 to deliver manufactured “terrorist” suspects selected to meet the agenda of the federal government. Justin Trudeau and Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland needed such a spectacle at Coutts to justify the invocation of the Emergency Act.
In the bail hearings of each member of the Coutts Four and in the now-over-two years of so-called pre-trail proceedings, the compliant judges in the Lethbridge Court House have given Crown officials together with Justin Trudeau’s captive media, basically everything they asked for.
The legacy media venues sought legal standing in court with the goal of getting their hands on RCMP records. The media outlets subsequently cherry picked excerpts from Mountie note books in order to create highly prejudiced trials by media that accompany the still ongoing pre-trial processes.
This chain of complicity linking the agendas of the RCMP, the Crown Prosecutor, the Legacy media, and subtle yet decisive influence of the Prime Minister’s Office in the Lethbridge Court House, has created a massive bias in the proceedings. Judge David A. Labrenz has presided over this disreputable display of due process gone terribly wrong. Things would have been much more simple for Judge Labrenz if he didn’t feel such an urge to protect the professional standing of the overzealous Crown prosecutor, Stephen Johnston.
The Freedom Convoy as One of the Finest Representations of Political Righteousness That Canada Has Ever Produced
In order to justify and rationalize the invocation of the Emergency Act, which suspended the normal operations of Canada’s existing constitution, Trudeau’s primary handler, Chrystia Freeland, sought to identify the Freedom Convoy with terrorism. Since the events of September 11, 2001, many governments have resorted to this tactic. They have smeared the most effective of their political opponents as “terrorists.” This underhanded technique has had a hugely corrosive effect on the remnants of our tattered democracies.
The Freeland-Trudeau government continues to deploy this tactic to this day in trying to hold at bay the principles of the Freedom Convoy movement that provides by far the most serious opposition faced by the Trudeau since he became Prime Minister in 2015.
The obsession with trying to discredit the Freedom Convoy movement has shown up with a vengeance in the Lethbridge Alberta Court House where the Coutts Four, now the Coutts Two, have been pilloried by an especially aggressive Crown prosecutor and his team.
Stephen Johnston’s conduct in the case is highly reflective of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s political agenda in the effort to demean the Freedom Convoy’s role as one of the finest external representations of political righteousness Canada has ever produced. Johnston makes no secret of his federal attachments, especially when he wears his CBC socks in the court room.
In the winter of 20021-22 the Truckers movement gained widespread prominence nationally and internationally. The many-faceted movement became so-influential because of the coherence of its evidence-based critique condemning the Liberal government especially for its mandated policies of forced injections.
Trudeau was clearly taking supranational directives from above as did most of the world’s governments. Together these governments ignored the science to make the same set of disastrous decisions in the wake of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) unfounded declaration in March of 2020 that a global pandemic was underway.
Try as media, government and Big Pharma do to hide and downplay the consequences of the mass injection’s systematic violation of bodily autonomy, the outcomes are proving to be catastrophic. Canada has a significant portion of the many millions of premature deaths and injuries caused by the billions of injections administered worldwide.
Following the playbook of notorious medical fraudster, Dr. David N. Fisman, the Trudeau government’s divisive and hate-laden policies ran contrary to the requirements of the scientific method, sound public health, as well as the requirements of national unity and national security at a time of great crisis.
The web of connections linking the malfeasant Trudeau policies to the degradation of national institutions like the University of Toronto, the Canadian Medical Association and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, is outlined by Dr. Regina Watteel in Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science (Rain Song Books, 2023)
Justin Trudeau, a big fan of one-party rule in China, was looking to invoke the Emergency Act since the early days of the WHO-declared pandemic in 2020. As he explained in the election campaign of 2015, Trudeau admires dictatorships because of their ability to get things done in a hurry.
With a view to invoking the Emergency Act in early 2022, federal pressure was put on police to find evidence of possible terrorism through the search for loaded guns in the cabs of those engaged in the Truckers’ parking protests in Ottawa. By the early days of February the Royal Canadian Mounted Police began to come under pressure to come up with some terrorist suspects in the Freedom Convoy movement in Alberta.
In Canada the RCMP is a federal force much like the FBI in the United States. In fact the FBI are well known as a political agency available to help the Democratic Party much as the RCMP have made themselves a partisan political asset for the Liberal Party of Canada.
The RCMP is different than the FBI because the Mounties are also contracted by some provincial governments, including that of Alberta, to enforce provincial laws, policies and jurisdictions. Accordingly, the RCMP’s policing of Freedom Convoy’s protest at the Alberta-Montana border crossing near Coutts involved both federal and provincial chains of command. Both Prime Minister Trudeau and Premier Jason Kenney were in charge of different elements of the RCMP contingent assigned to Coutts Alberta.
The Woke Fascism of Chyristia Freeland, the Main Handler of Justin Trudeau
The RCMP obliged the requests emanating from Ottawa. The political needs of the Freeland-Trudeau duo required the Mounties to produce some terrorist suspects apprehended at the Truckers protest at the Alberta-Montana border crossing near Coutts. By February 14 Trudeau and Freeland could check off the terrorist box as they announced the Emergency Act’s suspension of the regular operation of the Canadian constitution.
Freeland actually wrote down the plan she attributed to directives she received from a prominent banker. On the telephone this individual instructed the Deputy Prime Minister to do exactly what she and Trudeau ended up doing. On 24 November 2022 at the Inquiry conducted by Judge Paul Rouleau, Freeland was questioned by Brendan Miller, a Lawyer for the Freedom Convoy. Miller made his point by showing Freeland her own notes. See below.
“YOU NEED TO DESIGNATE THE GROUP AS A TERRORIST GROUP, SEIZE THEIR ASSETS, AND IMPAIR THEM”
In trying to justify her hostility to the Freedom Convoy, Freeland explained that she had to defend the Canadian economy from the damage being done by the Truckers movement. She avoided altogether any mention of the reality that the global lockdowns she had helped impose on Canada represented the most deep and broadly-based assault ever on the entire global economy.
The lockdowns had no positive effect whatsoever on global health. The fiction of “asymptomatic infection” together with Neil Ferguson’s ridiculous modelling provided false pretexts for the lockdowns that initiated humanity’s descent into a twilight zone of twisted madness that engulfs us yet.
While the lockdowns did not counter disease they did cause inflated rates of suicides, addictions and domestic violence. Moreover the lockdowns attacked small businesses and the middle class while edifying big monopolistic entities including big box stores like Costco and Wal*Mart.
This phenomenon was part of the most huge transfer ever of wealth upward from working people to the billionaires’ club whose bases of operation include the World Economic Forum within which Freeland is a trustee. By how many times did her wealth and that of Justin Trudeau multiply during the manufactured COVID crisis? Why did Trudeau feel he had to purchase ten injection doses for every Canadian?
How much has the Trudeau Foundation benefited from royalties derived from the lipid nanoparticle procedures developed with public investments at the University of British Columbia? The development of lipid nanoparticles has proven lucrative because of governments’ imposition of injection mandates.
The innovation, however, is extremely hazardous to human health because lipid nanoparticles help facilitate the toxic spread of Spike proteins even while they help disable natural immunity from T-cells. Lipid nanoparticles help facilitate the spread of gene-modifying mRNA throughout the entire body.
Chyrstia Freeland exercises far too much power in the government of Canada. She plays a role in the Trudeau government similar to that of Dick Cheney during the administration of US President George W. Bush. Freeland does much of the hands-on leadership, covering for Trudeau’s large gaps in terms of formal education, general knowledge, and his difficulty giving his complex job sustained concentration.
In her political career, Freeland has endeavoured to veil how much of her geopolitical understanding she has derived from that of her maternal grandfather, who was Adolf Hitler’s propaganda chief in Galacia covering parts of present-day Ukraine and Poland. This orientation was prominent in Freeland’s decision to include a Waffen SS veteran, Yaroslav Hunka, in the Parliamentary welcome extended by the Canadian government to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in 2023
Freeland’s infatuation with the pro-Hitler heritage that she shares with many members of the Ukrainian Canadian community rubbed off on Justin Trudeau. Like most ill-educated Canadian parliamentarians, Trudeau didn’t seem to understand that in WWII, Canada was the ally, not the enemy, of the Soviet Union.
Freeland’s negative impact on Canada’s government should not be underestimated. It was well reflected in early 2022 with her agreement to treat the Truckers as terrorists who should be impaired starting with the seizure of their assets for the crime of disagreeing with the government. Those protesters picked out by the RCMP to become the Coutts Four, the main poster boys to justify the Emergency Act, have been especially impaired.
As it turned out, however, Federal Court Justice Richard Mosley determined that in January of 2024 that “It was unreasonable for the Liberal government to use the Emergency Act to quell the Freedom Convoy protests in the national capital and at key border points two years ago.”
The trial of the Coutts Four men arose in the context of the effort to clear the way for the government attempt in the winter of 2022 to “quell the Freedom Convoy protests.” Was the decision on the part of the Federal Court that the Emergency Act was outside the realm of law, a factor in the decision to plea bargain with two members of the Coutts Four? What are the implications of carrying on with the proceedings in the Lethbridge Court House given the widening array of legal uncertainties attending the matter?
Two of the Coutts Four continue to be jailed for more than two years now, having been convicted of nothing. All the while they were expected to bear the enormous cost of hiring lawyers. They were stripped from their families, their jobs, and their decent reputations, in order to provide the Trudeau-Freeland government with whipping boys. They were demonized as caricatures cast in made-up role of someone’s idea of White supremacist neo-Nazi militia members.
As shall be demonstrated below, this caricature springs from the fantasies of Trudeau’s mentor, Bernie Farber. This caricature emerges from the dubious genesis and activities of the so-called Canadian Anti-Hate Network.
In spite of the media disinformation, the Coutts protests like the Ottawa protests were overwhelmingly peaceful. At Coutts about 10,000 visitors gathered in the area on any given weekend.
The protests in Ottawa, Coutts and many other border points gave legitimate expression to the well-organized public distrust of all levels of government who engaged in many criminal acts done under the guise of protecting public health. Now the evidence has become overwhelming that COVID officialdom did not serve the public interest. In fact they went against the public interest. Moreover they continue to do so.
Those protesters who warned against ingesting the gene modifying concoctions were in fact performing a public service. They were trying to save many lives that the authorities in charge put at risk and then extinguished in significant numbers by mandating the mRNA injections.
All these murders go unaddressed even as the government showers tens of millions of dollars and huge political capital on a murder trial in Alberta where no actual murders took place. No wonder agencies of law enforcement as well as the governments that run them are suffering such huge deficits of public trust these days.
These sentiments are not marginal. They have been well stated by many credible observers including Neil Oliver and Tucker Carlson who have assembled enormous audiences because of their acumen in speaking truth to power
Those who gathered in and around Coutts in the depth of winter were doing a selfless public service. Canada’s Freedom Convoy movement kindled hope among millions of people in Canada and around the world. The warm international response to the Truckers’ tactics generated a precious light of understanding in midst of the dark operations lowered onto humanity by many officials as narrow-minded and malicious as the Freeland-Trudeau duo.
Crime Fraud Exposed. Crime Fraud Covered Up in the Lethbridge Court House?
One of the most striking aspects of what I have seen in the trial so far are the allegations by the Tonii K Roulston, former lawyer of the defendant Tony Olienick.
Due to a mistake in material distributed by the Crown according to the rules of disclosure, Ms Roulston and three other defence lawyers, was sent material they should not have received.
Ms. Roulston read the material and determined it contained evidence that the Crown prosecutor, Stephen Johnston, had committed crimes in the form of the advice he had given to the RCMP. As I learned in the course of the trial, the Crown Prosecutor is seen as the “lawyer” for the RCMP. Their communications are apparently subject to “privilege.” In other words they are supposed to be secret.
The matter was the subject of a Voir Dire in the pre-trial proceeding between July 25 and 27, 2023. Ms. Roulston was so shocked by what she saw exposed in the wrongfully released material, that she spoke out in the trial. She accused Stephen Johnston of “crime fraud.” She explained there was an original “crime fraud” that was so clearly outside the realm of law that it should not, Ms Roulston declared, be subject to “privilege.”
Ms. Roulston went on to indicate the original crime fraud led to a domino effect. In my understanding of how Ms. Roulston explained it in the court proceedings, the RCMP engaged in escalating forms of illegal activity based on the “privileged” advice of its “lawyer.”
I was astounded by the implications of what I heard coming from the lips of Ms. Roulston, who apparently went to the Alberta Bar Association with a view to reporting Mr. Johnston for violating key codes of the legal profession. I listened very carefully as the judge responded to her allegations.
At that point in the proceeding Judge Labrenz had not seen the document in question. In fact he was in the process of deciding whether or not he should look at the document and thereby violate the “privilege” of the RCMP’s relationship with its lawyer, namely Mr. Johnston. At that point the Judge decided not to look at the document in question. Of course Mr. Johnston had been excluded from this part of the pre-trial hearing.
I took note of the fact that, after her presentation, Judge Labrenz commended Ms. Roulston for her handling of this difficult matter. He thereby acknowledged her conduct was appropriate under the circumstances.
I wrote about this matter in some detail in early August. Here is an excerpt from that essay.
“This strange alignment of circumstances provides some of the context and background for the striking commentary presented by Tonii Roulston. Ms. Roulston has described serial sequences of adverse consequences derived from the original Crime Fraud. The initial Crime Fraud was, in Ms. Roulston’s estimation, “illegal” and therefore not eligible to come with the privilege of Solicitor-Client confidentiality. This pattern of illegality Ms. Roulston saw reflected repeatedly in an escalation of RCMP misconduct that ensued once the original Crime Fraud had taken place.
Ms. Roulston spoke in court in ways that were concurrently vague yet assertive about the nature of these subsequent Crime Frauds. She did make, for instance, specific references to a weaponized hockey bag that the RCMP may have maliciously planted on the Coutts protestors. Below is my own list of possible examples of actions that might be interpreted as candidates for the status of Crime Frauds:
Sending in women who presented themselves as fellow Coutts protestors while hiding the fact that they were RCMP assets. At least one of the still-unnamed assets, whose testimony seems to have been crucial in the process of denying bail to the accused, is reputedly young and presented herself as available for romantic and/or sexual relationships. Does this approach to the gathering of “evidence” by the RCMP constitute entrapment?
The taping of private conversations by the accused with the disguised police assets and the recording of all manner of private cell phone conversations. Again, this evidence contained in something called an Omnibus document, including direct quotes drawn from the still-unnamed female assets, was utilized frequently by Stephen Johnston and his colleagues in order to deny bail to the accused. The Crown’s position on this possible taping and wire tapping seems to vary with time and with changing circumstances. Crime Fraud is not consistent with truth.
Conducting immediate or near-immediate police interrogations with the arrested parties, sometimes without proper provisions for solicitor-client preparations, consultations, and interventions.
Setting in motion the discussions about, and possible movement of a hockey bag now widely reported to be for the purpose of transporting guns. Was this real or imagined action an RCMP attempt to plant false evidence on their targets? It seems the RCMP assets were pressured to become involved in the process. For security reasons they would have had to be taped in their communications with one or more of the accused. Apparently this may be one of the subjects on which the two (“not recorded?”) police assets apparently do not agree.
Trying to incite anger in the protestors with unnecessary provocations including the RCMP doing serious property damage to privately-owned earth moving equipment.
Wide RCMP distribution to media venues of a picture showing various weapons along with small Diagolon crests, on Feb. 14 and 15, 2022. The picture was distributed without any explanation or evidence from the RCMP describing how this image was supposed to be connected to the Coutts protest.
Much to my surprise the Judge returned Stephen Johnston to the proceedings. I have made no secret of my view since his return to the proceedings. As I see it, even the hint that the Crown prosecutor is under a cloud suspicion of having committed one or more “crime frauds” in the course of his interactions with the RCMP, should be enough for him to withdraw from the legal proceeding. In matters such as this one, not only should justice be done, but justice should be seen to be done.
Why did Mr. Johnston not do the right thing and remove himself from the proceedings on his own initiative. Why should Judge Labrenz assume that those of us who saw and heard Tonii Roulston’s presentation in court should ignore what transpired and expect us to accept the legitimacy of the subsequent proceedings.
What of the fact that Tonii Roulston subsequently removed herself from the proceedings following her references to Stephen Johnston and Crime Fraud? What incentives or threats might she have received to make herself scarce? Why do those running the court’s proceedings deserve the benefit of the doubt given what transpired in the course of the long journey to Tonii Rouslston’s accusations of Crime Fraud as a possible factor influencing the dubious actions of the RCMP at Coutts?
One could argue, as a sycophantic friend of the court already did to me, that Johnston must be considered innocent until proven guilty. In a trial where the accused have been incarcerated for over two years without any finding of guilt, the ironies are abundant. The Coutts Four have been treated as guilty until proven innocent by the Crown, by the Trudeau government, by its captive media, and by the fake experts in Bernie Farber’s so-called Canadian Anti-Hate Network.
The Legacy of the Collaboration Between Grant Bristow and Bernie Farber as a Prototype for the Current Goals and Objectives of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network
Below there is an excerpt describing how Global News described the arrest of people at Coutts on February 14. The Emergency Act was declared on Valentine’s Day, 2022. Is there any sign that Global News and the people they quote in the story, treated the suspects as innocent parties because they had not yet been found guilty in court?
If the spectacular account of the violent actions of the accused group are true, how did it happen two years later that those condemned for conspiring to kill cops were released on the basis of time served for lesser charges? Was the Crown bluffing all along hoping to use the two-year pre-trial period to fish out some sort of evidence to support the original contention that a gang of would-be cop killers had been discovered at Coutts.
Global News reported the following arrests, complete with the publication of the now-notorious photo of the arsenal supposedly seized at Coutts. Many see the photo as Exhibit A in the RCMP’s feeding of those with the means to conduct trials by media. The Global News Story was introduced as follows:
“Anti-hate experts are raising concerns after a picture of weapons, ammunition and body armour seized at the border protest at Coutts, Alta. showed patches belonging to a neo-nazi group in Canada.
The Canadian Anti-Hate Network tweeted on Monday that gear seized by police at Coutts includes a plate carrier with Diagolon patches. According to the network, Diagolon is an accelerationist movement that believes a revolution is inevitable and necessary to collapse the current government system. It wants to build its ideal nation-state, which runs diagonally from Alaska through the western provinces down to Florida.
It is also a neo-fascist militia with a sizeable support base across the country, said the network.
“A lot of them claim to be ex-military members and a lot of them claim to have some kind of military training. There’s very much a militia kind of vibe within the network and there have been lots of talks of weapons,” said Elizabeth Simons, the Canadian Anti-Hate Network’s deputy director.”
The absurd claims made by the RCMP in conjunction with Canadian Anti-Hate Network and the Legacy media about Jeremy Mackenzie, Diagolon and the Truckers protests, but especially at Coutts, are the subject of investigative journalism in The Hategate Affair: The Umasking of Canada’s Hate Industry by Caryma Sa’d and Elisa Hategan.
The authors document the lazy, careless and often reckless approach to intelligence gathering of the RCMP, former Federal Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino, the Legacy media, and the fake terrorist experts put forward by Bernie Farber and his entourage, including Justin Trudeau. Sa’d and Hategan trace how the same same unsupported and often absurd claims about Mackenzie and Diagolon keep getting exchanged without any genuine research or skepticism being brought to bear.
The absurdities making the rounds in Canada ended up catching the attention of intelligence practitioners throughout the Five Eyes which also includes Australia, the United States, New Zealand, and the UK. The shoddiness of the intelligence gathering on the Truckers movement of Canada ended up embarrassing the negligent parties.
Some of the most interesting material in the HateGate Affair pulled me to conduct my own research on Bernie Farber in the late 1980s and early 1990s. I learned much from a Report to the Solicitor-General of Canada entitled The Heritage Front Affair (9 December, 1994)
In the late 1980s and in first half of the 1990s, Grant Bristow and Bernie Farber worked closely together on different sides of a common project handsomely funded and backed on Bristow’s side by CSIS, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service. Wolfgang Droege became a kind of figurehead of the Heritage Front. However the CSIS undercover agent, Grant Bristow, became the logistical, ideological and financial driving force of Canada’s most prominent neo-Nazi organization.
The Heritage Front embodied a clear attempt to supply the need for neo-Nazi activists outside the network of genuine supporters built up over many years through the concerted efforts of German-Canadian National Socialist, Ernst Zundel. Bristow became more and more assertive in seeking to expand and radicalize the organization. Bristow and Bernie Farber are often described as “friends” but it seems clear to me they were more like colleagues.
By the late 1980s after the famous Toronto trials of Zundel, Farber had become the top official in the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC). Its stated purpose was to protect Jews in Canada from the incursions of Anti-Semitism. In order to justify themselves, however, organizations like the CJC or the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith in the USA need to be able to point to specific groups and individuals who seem to embody animosity towards Jews collectively. There is a need to help along the creation of enemies for the Israel Lobby to oppose and to counter.
Similarly, the viability of Israel depends of persuading a number of Jews in the so-called Diaspora that they live in perilous places and should emigrate to the Jewish state to be more safe and secure, as unlikely as this possibility is becoming under current conditions
No doubt CSIS was well aware of the teamwork involved in Bristow’s and Farber’s collaboration.
As I see it, the Canadian Anti-Hate Network is probably working with Canada’s intelligence agencies with the goal of creating something like the Grant Bristow’s version of the Heritage Front. The Freedom Convoy may well have begun with a Deep State effort to create a Canadian version of the Trump’s so-called Deplorables.
Even if this was the case, however, the initiative escaped the control of the likes of CSIS. The Freedom Convoy become a genuine movement of conscientious citizens seeking an escape from the Trudeau government’s atrocious Covidian policies. The criminal nature and outcomes of these policies has yet to be seriously addressed in Canada and many other countries, creating the growing storm of anger identified by Neil Oliver.
I can easily picture Bernie Farber, an extremely important Toronto member of the Liberal Party of Canada, writing the angry phrases mouthed by Justin Trudeau in response to the arrival in Ottawa of the Freedom Convoy. When Bernie Farber chose to get involved with the Truckers’ Ottawa parking protest, he discovered the following document.
Farber was immediately confronted by Jonathan Kay, a prominent Zionist journalist himself, who exposed the reality the document in question came from Miami, not from the theories of any members of the Ottawa parking protest.
Bernie Farber is still acting to raise the alarms as he did as CJC boss during the period when his “friend,” Grant Bristow, was an undercover agent for CSIS running the main neo-Nazi organization in Canada. Clearly Farber is intent on building up some part of the Freedom Convoy as his next project in manufacturing up neo-Nazi alarmism. What is to be said of Farber’s construction of ridiculous conspiracy theories such as the following?
Who will play the role of Grant Bristow in the latest round of constructing a useful enemy?
Appendix
Compare and contrast the two very different videos below presenting very different views of the Freedom Convoy protest. In “Stand on Guard” there are many scenes that illustrate the excitement generated along the Truckers route at the height of an arctic winter in Canada. These scenes constitute a lasting record of the spontaneous embrace by many of the message of hope generated by the Freedom Convoy.
The Fifth Estate piece by the government of Canada’s state broadcaster, CBC, simply ignores this edifying perspective. It discounts and demeans the legitimate views of many millions of Canadians. CBC’s thought police cop, Gillian Findlay, highlights a few individuals in her effort to negate and discredit those who were inspired by the Trucker’s intervention to push back on the wrongheaded Covidian policies of the Canadian government.
Looking out at the World from Canada is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
An excellent and thorough summary of the facts, by Prof Anthony Hall. Prof Hall highlights the dirty deeds conducted by mRNA bioweapons manufacturers, the Government of Canada in pushing the covid jabs by way of serious coercion, bribes and threats of lost employment etc, leading to the eventual Canada wide frustrations seen in the peaceful National Freedom Convoy events and ultimately the political charges against many protestors, culminating in the trumped up political entrapment engineered by the RCMP over alleged charges of conspiracy to commit murder known as the Coutts 4 et al.
As far as the Coutts 4 goes, being held without bail, while those charged with committing atrocious murders in other non related cases, walk free until their trials, is a travesty of Justice. There is a saying, " the process is the punishment" and that certainly applies to the Coutts 4. The legal fee's alone in the 100's of thousands, loss of employment, and having to sell their houses make it dead obvious that Law-fare is well established in Canada.
What used to be a slow tip toe or creep of Marxist tyranny aka Wokeism, in Canada now seems since the start of the Covid 19 plandemic, more like a Japanese bullet train heading our once great country and democracy of Canada into a traumatic and tragic end.
I call on all Canadians to have faith that the malevolent intent of the 'purveyors' of the Covid 19 plandemic will eventually be brought to Justice and held accountable for the untimely and premature deaths attributed to the defective mRNA clot shots (allegedly meeting the legal definition of bioweapons), loss of Canada's vibrant economy and the damage done to the political and judicial systems, in what we hope will be a remake of the Nuremberg Trials in Canada. Divine Retribution is coming....
We most all do our parts in exposing these Crimes against Humanity !
Depth charges here, Anthony. Great backgrounding and bringing your readers up to speed on the 80 mph head on collision Klanada is about to experience.
"YOU NEED TO DESIGNATE THE GROUP AS A TERRORIST GROUP, SEIZE THEIR ASSETS, AND IMPAIR THEM”
Oh, that old end around football play right out of MI-6 and CIA.
Cheers . . . .
An excellent and thorough summary of the facts, by Prof Anthony Hall. Prof Hall highlights the dirty deeds conducted by mRNA bioweapons manufacturers, the Government of Canada in pushing the covid jabs by way of serious coercion, bribes and threats of lost employment etc, leading to the eventual Canada wide frustrations seen in the peaceful National Freedom Convoy events and ultimately the political charges against many protestors, culminating in the trumped up political entrapment engineered by the RCMP over alleged charges of conspiracy to commit murder known as the Coutts 4 et al.
As far as the Coutts 4 goes, being held without bail, while those charged with committing atrocious murders in other non related cases, walk free until their trials, is a travesty of Justice. There is a saying, " the process is the punishment" and that certainly applies to the Coutts 4. The legal fee's alone in the 100's of thousands, loss of employment, and having to sell their houses make it dead obvious that Law-fare is well established in Canada.
What used to be a slow tip toe or creep of Marxist tyranny aka Wokeism, in Canada now seems since the start of the Covid 19 plandemic, more like a Japanese bullet train heading our once great country and democracy of Canada into a traumatic and tragic end.
I call on all Canadians to have faith that the malevolent intent of the 'purveyors' of the Covid 19 plandemic will eventually be brought to Justice and held accountable for the untimely and premature deaths attributed to the defective mRNA clot shots (allegedly meeting the legal definition of bioweapons), loss of Canada's vibrant economy and the damage done to the political and judicial systems, in what we hope will be a remake of the Nuremberg Trials in Canada. Divine Retribution is coming....
We most all do our parts in exposing these Crimes against Humanity !
Cheers...