The Founder of Rebel News Reports on the Online Harms Act. How Is Ezra's Objectivity Affected by His Role as an Agent of the Israel Lobby and Christian Zionism
Ezra Levant is an energetic gadfly in the mostly robotic zone of Trudeau-funded, gate-kept journalism in Canada. The Bad Boy In Chief of Rebel News presents himself as a firebrand of populist Conservatism. Ezra’s highest commitment, however, is to the Israel Lobby that he serves as zealously as does, for instance, Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, Bernie Farber, Steve Bannon, and Jonathan Kay.
Ezra and his Israel First compatriots may situate themselves on the Left or the Right. But above all, they are Zionists and well rewarded for it. In fact, it is almost impossible to gather a wide audience on the Internet in Canada or the United States without going along with the Zionist agenda on many many topics.
Looking out at the World from Canada is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Zionist orthodoxies are made to govern the operations of Internet search engines, the activities of many so-called fact checkers, and a wide array of funding mechanisms. For instance Ben Shapiro’s Clear Wire Internet operation is an ultra-Zionist operation disguised, like Rebel News, as a populist Conservative platform.
Ezra Levant has taken lots of criticism from some surprising sources for allegedly heading too far to the right in the people he chooses to join him as on-air personalities.
Ezra shakes this criticism off, however, in blowing his own horn as a prominent figure in the Israel Lobby of North America. In his own words in the Canadian Jewish News, “Rebel News is the most Zionist media organ in Canada.” In the essay, “Is Ezra Levant good for the Jews?” Ezra told reporter Ron Csillag that Rebel News is even more Zionist than than the CJN.
Zionism is the movement that led to the establishment of Israel in 1947-48 and to the sense of Jewish Supremacy now being expressed in the genocidal attempt to move closer to the “final solution” of eliminating Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank. In fact the agenda of demonizing the Palestinians who resist their occupation under Israel’s iron fist, has become the subject of shared interpretation by the complex of media outlets created by Ezra Levant primarily in Western Canada.
These venues including True North and the Western Standard. Ezra Levant has also created an Australian Rebel News with the help of Avi Yemini, a well-known Zionist zealot with strong family connections in Israel.
Ezra Levant’s Misrepresentation of the Online Harms Act, the Most offensive Legislation in Canada Ever
Ezra Levant is not above telling fibs to protect the Israel Lobby or to obfuscate his own adherence to Zionist chains of command that dictate the media content and spin of Rebel News operations. One of Ezras’s more significant fibs was his interpretation of the origins, sources and intent of the absolutely outrageous Online Harms Act.
In a interview on Just Right Media, Ezra pointed to Stephen Guibeault as the Liberal Party cabinet minister who “actually put the bones together” of Bill C-63. (Hear 8:30 minutes to 33 Minutes)
Ezra is playing with fire in misrepresenting the Online Harms Act. While billed as an enactment primarily to protect children from pedophiles and porn entrepreneurs, the Online Harms Act would finish off the job of making Canada a full-fledged tyranny
The proposed legislation threatens Canadians with Life Imprisonment for so-called “Hate Speech.” Yes, that’s right. The new law would treat a subjective assessment of a speech crime, or even a supposed thought crime that might burst out in articulation, as the equivalent of first-degree murder. The new law presents the formula for transforming Canada into a country built around a Soviet-style Gulag system.
The Online Hate Act, Bill C-63, also calls for House Arrest based on unsupported complaints put forward most probably by criminal cronies of the government. In Bill C-63, House Arrest can be accompanied by the required seizure of blood samples, urine samples, as well as the apprehension of lawfully registered fire arms.
It is well known that the Soviet Union and the notorious Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL) in North America, pioneered the manipulation of “hate speech” law with the goal of silencing political enemies.
In the current environment, hate speech law is the preferred ploy of censorship to bolster yet further the Israel Lobby’s preoccupation with the assertion of Jewish Supremacy in the style currently on public display in the genocidal campaign going on in Gaza.
The ADL has already come a long way in making itself the chief censor of the Internet by manipulating the concept of Hate Speech. This process has been explained by Valdis Bell in his essay, “The ADL: 100 Years of Hate.”
“The category of crime called “hate crimes” was virtually invented by the ADL. The purpose of such laws [originally was] to add extra penalties for acts which were already crimes under existing statutes — like murder, assault, etc. — if the perpetrator can be shown to have held prejudiced or “hateful” views which might have motivated his actions. Under “hate crime” laws, American citizens would receive different sentences for the same crime, depending on whether or not their thoughts are “Politically Correct” on issues relating to homosexuality, race, nationality, and politics. That such laws might have a chilling effect on free speech — for a thoughtful person would now realize that his every utterance on “sensitive” topics might someday be used against him in a court of law, should he be required to defend himself with force someday or even have an argument with a member of a “protected class” — was probably the ADL’s intention all along.”
By making Canada a realm where supposed thought crimes and speech crimes become the basis of life imprisonment and pervasive house arrest, we would be entering the big leagues of outright tyrannical governance. If Canadians open the door to life imprisonment and open-ended house arrest for the supposed crime of saying things to people that they don’t like, what comes next? Arbitrary executions and torture come next.
Under these circumstances it is perfectly acceptable to draw on history in order to understand what the criminal cabal currently running Canada has in mind for us. I think back to the murder spree of Soviet Bolsheviks after they took power.
The main dynamics of this mass murder was the revenge sought by many Bolshevik Jews who considered themselves victims by being present in Russia during the era of Czarist rule. Jews dominated the secret police known as the Cheka. In his book-length account of 200 years of Jewish-Russian interactions, Alexander Solzhenitsyn writes
Is Ezra Levant one of those in the global media who want to cover up the genesis of what Solzhenitsyn refers to as “the greatest slaughter of all time."?
Ezra Levant is playing with fire in misrepresenting the Online Harms Act as the dirty work of Stephen Guibeault. Ezra shows clearly where he stands by diverting attention away from the role of the Israel Lobby in the genesis and promotion of this, the most disastrous legislative initiative ever mounted by a Canadian government. The blaming of Guibeault is all-too- easy because Canada’s Minister of Environment and Climate Change has managed to make himself so easy to hate especially in Ezra’s home constituency of Alberta.
Stephen Guibeault
Albertans are especially well placed to recognize in Stephen Guibeault the ill-informed zealotry that makes Trudeau’s Minister of Environment and Climate Change such a serious menace to the health and wellbeing of Canada and Canadians. Ezra often makes well justified assessments concerning the atrocities imposed by the Guibeault-Trudeau axis in their hocus pocus excesses of climate change hucksterism.
Carbon is one of life’s major components, not its enemy. “Net-zero” is nothing but the cultish fantasy of wayward ideologues seeking to lure Canadians into false expectations of environmental nirvana. On the other hand, military geoengineering and its partner, rampant war mongering, does represent a serious threat to ecological sustainability. Humanity’s biggest menace comes from unregulated operations of warfare that do seriously disrupt weather patterns, atmospheric equilibrium together with the viability of many life forms on the land and in the sea.
Guibeault and Trudeau are climate change junkies with an addiction to manipulating public fears of environmental catastrophe for cynical political advantage. When it comes to the Online Harms Act, however, the climate change tag team are just yes men in a very corrupt scheme of decision that largely takes place far above the level of nation states. This scheme robs power and property from average people while privileging those that seek to further subjugate and exploit them.
The subjugation occurs in the media, in the courts, and in universities as well as at BlackRock and Vanguard. These financial megacartels are integral to a usury-based banking system empowering a tiny clique that hold charters to conjure up money out of thin air and lend it to governments and other entities at compound interest.
The Israel First Zionist Lobby , within which Ezra Levant is a prominent member, is well represented on all these sectors where power and wealth is disproportionately concentrated. Ezra Levant is a significant participant in the Lobby whose growing desperation forms a major part of the impetus behind the formulation of the Online Harms Act.
Along with similar initiatives in many countries, this tyrannical enactment is meant to become a primary weapon for the suppression of free speech in order to control the content of the Internet.
As an important Zionist operative in the media, Ezra Levant would be a beneficiary of the Online Harms Act. As we shall see, this enactment is meant to serve the Israel Lobby first and foremost. Levant has an interest in keeping Canadian gentiles ignorant of this fact. He has an interest in pointing attention away from the geopolitical role of Rebel News in helping to shape public opinion concerning the image of Israel, Zionism and Jews.
The Role of the Israel Lobby in Formulating and Publicizing the Online Harms Act
This quest to control the Internet has been a primary goal of the Israel Lobby for at least a generation. The Online Harms Act emerges from the international network of Zionist intrigue whose public face in Canada is, in part, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA).
Ezra Levant is obviously protecting the CIJA by veiling its prominent role in developing and publicizing the Online Harms Act, a legislative monstrosity that should never be enacted. We shouldn’t depend on actions by the Zionist-dominated judiciary to shield us from the impact of this terrible law.
Ezra Levant is covering up for the Israel Lobby by characterizing Stephen Guibeault as the primary agent of this nasty piece of work. In illuminating this cover up, we gain insight into Ezra’s frequent role in packaging distortions and half truths, the stock and trade of Rebel News. This venue is lauded by Levant as the media agency in Canada that is most intertwined with Zionist influence.
The longstanding CEO of CIJA goes by the name of Shimon Koffler Fogel, who basically represents the interests of Israel in many government Committees in Ottawa where the intelligence agencies and other Deep State entities conduct their secret interactions. The CIJA is pushing the Online Harms Act hard. In their promotional work the CIJA makes no bones about the fact this Internet censorship initiative should be adopted primarily because it is in line with what Jewish people say they want and need.
The CIJA asserts
Antisemitism is flourishing online and across Canada.
Statistics Canada data show that, year after year, Jews are the religious minority most targeted by hate crimes and the second-most targeted group overall. One of the main environments in which Jew-hatred flourishes unencumbered is online. As Jews know all too well, what happens online does not stay online. It affects our community, our children, in real life.
On Monday, February 26, the Minister of Justice, Arif Virani, tabled the long-awaited Bill C-63, otherwise known as the Online Harms Act.
This is concrete action from the Government of Canada to combat antisemitism, online hate, and online terrorist content [!!!!] – which has been allowed to fester on the internet for far too long. It protects vulnerable communities from the disproportionate amount of hate they receive online, while respecting freedom of speech.
Given the dramatic rise in antisemitism, this legislation has come at a time when it is needed most by Canada’s Jewish community.
Tell your local Member of Parliament that you want them to support the Online Harms Act.
The CIJA acknowledges in its literature that the Online Harms Act is part of an international Zionist project. Shomon Koffler Fogel reports. “We also have been working with major partner Jewish organizations in other countries including the ADL, the American Jewish Committee, the European Jewish Congress, the UK Board of Deputies, and the French CRIF.”
So far I have seen no discussion on any Canadian media, mainstream or alternative, indicating that the Canadian Online Harms Act was put together with a number of Jewish organizations in the United States and in Europe. Certainly Ezra Levant has been in no rush to clarify that the Harms Act emerges from an initiative of international Jewry, not Stephen Guibeault.
The CIJA indicates,
“Our goal has been to ensure the legislation both addresses the hateful rhetoric, harassment, and intimidation Jewish and other vulnerable communities face online and targets those who use the internet to prey on and radicalize individuals for terror – all while protecting freedom of expression.”
What do the authors mean when they refer to “the hateful rhetoric, harassment, and intimidation Jewish and other vulnerable communities face online.”? Who counts as a “vulnerable community”? Who decides? Is it a lesser [supposed] crime to say something unkind to, say, a White person who is automatically assumed to be a member of a predator community, not a vulnerable community?
What are the authors saying when they refer to “those who use the internet to prey on and radicalize individuals for terror.” Consider all the confused and toxic thinking that went into composing this loaded sentence.
Stunning in its audacity is the abuse of the word “terror” by those who publicized the term in misrepresenting the lies and crimes of 9/11. Is anyone who sends a message to anyone else, concerning why he or she doesn’t like a person, “radicalizing” the recipient of the message? The extravagant prejudices and shortsightedness displayed here are truly troubling.
The evidence is massive that there is no commitment on the part of the Israel Lobby, including the CIJA, to defend freedom of expression. The CIJA and the ruthless defamers at B’nai Brith Canada are notorious for their efforts to shut down free speech and deplatform their critics in the media and especially at universities.
The CIJA explain, “
“Over the past several years, CIJA has worked intensively with the federal government to introduce legislation to combat online harms….On February 26, the Online Harms Act was tabled. As one of the leaders in the debate over online hate and an important stakeholder in this issue, CIJA staff were invited to Parliament Hill to participate in the Minister’s press conference introducing the bill. Some of CIJA’s work is directly reflected in the content and language of the legislation.”
In the passage above, spokespeople for the CIJA proudly explain that their people worked on the language and content of Bill C-63. In fact they indicate that they have been working with the federal government “to combat” online harms for “several years.” The name of Stephen Guibeault doesn’t come up.
Does Arif Virani Come With the Tainted Legacy of the Trudeau-Aga Kahn Relationship?
Arif Virani, is the Ismaili member of the federal cabinet meant to steer this bill through Canada’s Parliament and then implement it. Virani was sworn in as Attorney General, the Minister of Justice, AND the Minister of State for Online Harms. The importance of the “Online Harms” initiative is reflected in the fact that the term has been added to the Minister of Justice’s full title and job description.
The top law officer in the government of Canada is to be the chief hatchet man in making sure information not to the government’s liking is eliminated from the Internet even as those who created the eliminated content are to be removed from society to languish in Canadian gulags or under house arrest.
Virani comes from the same Ismaili community led by Aga Kahn IV who lavishly entertained Trudeau and his family in the Bahamas during one of the early holidays of the Canadian PM. Trudeau responded to his gifts by arranging for a transfer of $50 million dollars for the Ismaili leader’s projects, including the sketchy Global Centre for Pluralism.
Virani, the Ismaili operative, is following the path of Aga Kahn IV in collaborating closely with Justin Trudeau. Virani is Trudeau's second replacement for Jody Wilson-Raybould.
Wilson-Raybould is the Canadian Attorney-General who refused to sanction the Prime Minister’s violations of the criminal law in his relations with the Liberal Party’s corporate cash cow, SNC-Lavalin. Trudeau, it seems, has learned his lesson never to have an honest Chief Law Officer in the federal government
Virani hails from Uganda. He at first presented the Online Harms Act is if it is primarily about protecting children from pedophilia and pornography. Its much more than that. The Bill is becoming a symbol, both inside and outside Canada, of how degraded Canada has become during this era when the most perverse agents of organized crime have seized control of the instruments of state.
Playing One Side Off Against the Other
Rebel News is one small part of the Zionist agencies integral to the massive influence of the Israel Lobby. In referring to the Zionists media, it must be understood that this is not some well-circumscribed part of the Western Media. Rather the Zionist twist forms a primary ingredient in the overall communications media in the West. Zionist figures own many media outlets, cartels, and search engine systems.
The agents of the owners are delegated control over most of the contents of the largest body of material that ends of up in newspapers, television, and the big venues that are most easy to find on the Internet. The enormous Jewish role in all forms of media culture is well understood by those who work in the field. Concurrently this subject is not widely discussed in public and, when it is, allegations of anti-Semitism appear almost inevitably.
Most mainstream media readily conform to Zionist priorities like downgrading the sovereign authority of national governments except for that of Israel. The other side of this move away from national authority is to build up the authority of global institutions like the World Economic Forum or the United Nations with its World Health Organization.
The effect of this transformation is to downgrade national elections, the role of parliaments and legislatures, and to greatly increase the power of unelected officials who answer not to voters but to industrial lobbies like Big Pharma and Big Tech. Another aspect of this downgrading of nation states, is to degrade the integrity of national borders except those of Israel. Most Zionist globalists support the free flow of people especially into Europe and North America from Africa and the Middle East.
Of course the unregulated free flow of large masses of immigrants into Europe and North America radically disrupts the integrity of deeply-rooted native populations. The influx of people disrupts whole economies in ways that undermine the wages of workers and the social harmony embedded in all sorts of established relations. This disruptive impact of mass immigration generates opposition that “Conservative” media outlets like Zionist Rebel News try to capture, guide and exploit.
One of Ezra’s clients has been Tommy Robinson. Robinson often performs like an actor for hire. Robinson emerged from an organization known as the English Defence League. The English Defence League is an anti-immigrant organization often described as “far-right.”
It is convenient for Ezra that Tommy is especially hostile to Muslims, whether new to England or not. Moreover Ezra kept telling us that Tommy is assertively hostile to any expressions of ant-Semitism. This hostility apparently gets him into trouble with Muslims. Robinson is consistently in and out of jail, providing lots of drama for Ezra’s audience. According to Ezra, Robinson sometimes stays in his own special prison “suite” equipped with personal gym.
The reporting by Rebel News on the Tommy Robinson case points to the importance of the interaction between the part of the Zionist media that favours globalism and open borders, and the smaller Conservative division of the Israel Lobby that is hostile to mass immigration. The Zionists are adept at exercising control over the media at both the pro- and anti- extremes of the immigration question.
In fact the Israel Lobby is adept at placing its agents into opposing sides of the debate over a broad array of other topics. You can’t really lose when you can play both ends of any contention against one another. Its like investing in a hedge fund.
This strategy helps clarify the role in many fields of media venues like Ezra Levant’s Rebel News or Ben Shapiro’s Clear Wire. Consider, for instance, the implications of Ezra’s falsely putting the whole Online Harms fiasco on Stephen Guibeault’s lap.
While Ezra at Rebel News pretends to be against Bill C-63, the mainstream media mostly goes along with the propaganda generated by the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs.
Many lobbies try to have a presence on both sides of disagreements. However when it comes to this strategy, the Jewish Lobby belongs in a class of its own.
The Jewish Lobby has so much wealth, so many captive judges, prosecutors and media outlets, as well as so much political networking in its corner, that it is in an unparalleled position to control the whole spectrum of public discourse.
We are engulfed in a closed system that is so pervasive its made to seem invisible. There is so little room outside of this closed system that it is hard for we the people to have any meaningful say at all in how we are governed. The Israel Lobby has been shutting us out from any meaningful influence over our own governments.
Pastor Artur Pawlowski, Rebel News, Christian Zionism and Israel-Alberta Relations
In recent years one of the star performers frequently featured on Rebel News has been Pastor Artur Pawlowski. When I first saw Artur Pawlowski in action, he was speaking from the steps of the Lethbridge City Hall. He was wearing a very prominent Star of David/Israeli Flag armband. That surprised me.
When Pastor Pawlowski returned to Lethbridge a few months later, he was wearing the same armband. I asked him why. He responded by repeating the meme, “Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East.”
When I replied by wondering if the Palestinians would agree with him, Artur answered directly. He said Palestinians were “savages.” They were “uncivilized.” That position seems to conform well to the orientation of Rebel News in both Canada and Australia.
For several years Ezra featured Artur as the leading light of Christian Zionism in Alberta. Christian Zionism recasts Jesus from the Prince of Peace into an agent and ally of wars for Greater Israel. Pastor Pawlowski was well prepared for this role. He was groomed to play a pivotal role in Alberta-Israel relations.
As part of this process, Artur and his family were treated to a three week vacation in Israel.
Beginning in 2020 the COVID restrictions and then the Injection mandates were eased into place by the globalist forces behind the manufactured crisis. In the course of these developments, Pastor Pawlowski became one of Alberta’s most insistent critics of the response to the WHO-declared pandemic. He was a frequent guest at Rebel News whose journalist team followed Artur’s every move from speech to speech as he moved throughout the province.
Then came a period where Pastor Pawlowski’s treatment very much resembled the treatment given Tommy Robinson. Artur was in and out of jail and frequently in the media but especially at his home base for coverage, Rebel News. Its audience grew significantly amidst all the hubbub.
While Ezra Levant kept score of Pastor Pawlowski’s fines and his cumulative days in jail, it seems that the Polish-Canadian preacher was always strategically available to meet with important Republican senators, Conservative pundits and other luminaries in the United States. Artur must have been injected to fly in airplanes and to move so easily back and forth across the Canada-US border.
Among his US media engagements was an interview in War Room with Trump’s former adviser, Steve Bannon. Of course before the Gaza debacle, the subject of the Israel Lobby rarely came up on network television in either Canada or the United States.
The correct assumption is that all the top officials are Zionist compliant, otherwise they could not get the media coverage they need to get elected or appointed to high office. The mouthpieces of Biden and Trump can theatrically duke it out, but not on the issue of USA’s relations with Israel. In fact often presidential candidates try to outdo one another in promising to help Israel achieve its objectives.
The same forces are equally operative in Canada where the leaders of all the major political parties must receive Zionist sanction in order to attain their positions. In Canada, both Trudeau and Opposition Leader, Pierre Poilievre, are Zionists who depend on the backing of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, CIJA.
Here are both men standing at attention behind the CIJA Leader, Shimon Koffler Fogel, holding forth at at the podium. If you go by the message signalled in this photo, who really is in charge? Why is there no Canadian flag on the stage on which the Canadian PM and Opposition Leader are both standing?
Neither Rebel News nor its Christian Zionist affiliates, True North and Western Standard, have been pushing to force some sort of legal accountability on officials who pushed the unsafe and ineffective injections on people, some of whom were killed, maimed or enfeebled because of it.
Distinguishing the Good Guys From the Bad Guys Through Performance Art
Rebel News seems to cover dribs and drabs of legitimate news surrounded by episodes that amount to play acting and performance art. This performance art is designed to dramatize pre-conceived spectacles meant to illustrate the distinctions between the good guys and the bad guys.
The pressure to come up with morality dramas has become more intense since the government of Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel initiated its assault on the civilian population of Gaza in the name of “eradicating Hamas.”
As the genocidal character of the assault has become increasingly obvious to a growing portion of the world’s people, suddenly the actions of the Israel Lobby have become subject to new forms of scrutiny in ways that were unprecedented until recently. For instance Israel has been charged by the International Court of Justice— the World Court— with committing genocide.
Ezra Levant and David Menzies have been responding to these developments in Toronto with a clear eye to depicting Israel as the victim and Palestinians as predators. Perhaps the drama that played out in front of a Toronto police station happened spontaneously but I suspect its not that simple.
Whatever was Taking place, it enabled Ezra to yell out into the microphone that we should probably recognize one of the men in a Palestinian scarf. No name is given. Instead Ezra announces, “He’s the guy who says hateful things at synagogues and at Jewish schools. He’s the one who has been leading the Hamas rallies around Toronto. He’s the one who cannot force the cops to enforce Sharia law.”
Looking out at the World from Canada is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
'Hate speech' is such an absurd notion that if we weren't by now inured to the ever-increasing absurdities of our rulng dictatorship we would see clearly that it is - of course - proposed by the insane cult that literally hates everybody outside it.
Something else, no, the tutelage of the Canadian Goyim under the heavy and broad swarm of books, radio, TV, movies, museums, art gallaries, schools, universities, medicine, psychology, politics, banking, businesses, tech, pharma, politics. The Holocaust Industry has turned into Jews for Christ and Christ for Jews in that land.
Funny how Klanada is now Gilead?
"This is Gilead. No one gets out."
— Moira names a "disadvantage" of a society practicing slavery and human exploitation
The storyline hasn't detailed how Gilead's government and state function precisely, however a theocratic, inner party of men, more appropriately termed a junta called "Committee" appears to be in charge. They rule from Washington, D.C., which is the capital of Gilead.
Political maps of Gilead reveal that Gilead abolished America's federal system of government and states, and has become a unitary republic with a centralized government and the former states reorganized into larger "districts". On a regional level, Gilead is governed by "Councils" as boards of local Commanders.
Gilead borders Canada to the north and Mexico to the south.
+--+
Of course, Atwood is another fool like Stephen King, all about Ukraine buggery.
+--+
But she's on with Palestine:
... for decades we have been encouraging everyone to say "Never again!" to the horrors of ethnic cleansing. Ethnic cleansing was a horror when it was practiced on Native Americans forced to walk the Trail of Tears. Ethnic cleansing was a horror when it was practiced on Jews, Gypsies and other victims of the Nazis during the Holocaust. It was a horror when it was practiced during the darkest days of apartheid in South Africa. Ethnic cleansing remains a horror whenever we find it being practiced anywhere in the world. And ethnic cleansing remains a horror when Israel practices it against Palestinians today.
I lived as best I could, and then I died.
Be careful where you step: the grave is wide.
—Michael R. Burch, "Epitaph for a Palestinian Child"
Margaret Atwood has formally opposed Israel's eviction of Palestinians and Bedouins by signing an open letter addressed to Israeli and Canadian leaders. Dr. Gabor Maté, a Jewish Holocaust survivor, calls such evictions "nothing but ethnic cleansing" and says "One thing I've learned is you don't be quiet when things happen that shouldn't happen."
You can read Margaret Atwood's article "The Shadow Over Israel" below. As she points out, Israel's horrendous treatment of Palestinians "haunts everything" in the region, and a brutal military occupation that denies writing paper and pizza to innocent children and their mothers can only be seen by the equality-loving people of the free world as being incredibly unfair, cruel, petty and vindictive. Jimmy Carter made a similar observation when he saw children in Gaza being denied coloring books and crayons. How can an advanced nation like Israel be so petty, so vindictive, so cruel?
You can also read a poignant letter written by Palestinian students who live in Gaza, imploring Atwood to take a firm stand against what they called "the brutal, hermetic, medieval siege that Israel is perpetrating against us, the 1.5 million Palestinians of the Gaza Strip."
'Hate speech' is such an absurd notion that if we weren't by now inured to the ever-increasing absurdities of our rulng dictatorship we would see clearly that it is - of course - proposed by the insane cult that literally hates everybody outside it.
Something else, no, the tutelage of the Canadian Goyim under the heavy and broad swarm of books, radio, TV, movies, museums, art gallaries, schools, universities, medicine, psychology, politics, banking, businesses, tech, pharma, politics. The Holocaust Industry has turned into Jews for Christ and Christ for Jews in that land.
Funny how Klanada is now Gilead?
"This is Gilead. No one gets out."
— Moira names a "disadvantage" of a society practicing slavery and human exploitation
The storyline hasn't detailed how Gilead's government and state function precisely, however a theocratic, inner party of men, more appropriately termed a junta called "Committee" appears to be in charge. They rule from Washington, D.C., which is the capital of Gilead.
Political maps of Gilead reveal that Gilead abolished America's federal system of government and states, and has become a unitary republic with a centralized government and the former states reorganized into larger "districts". On a regional level, Gilead is governed by "Councils" as boards of local Commanders.
Gilead borders Canada to the north and Mexico to the south.
+--+
Of course, Atwood is another fool like Stephen King, all about Ukraine buggery.
+--+
But she's on with Palestine:
... for decades we have been encouraging everyone to say "Never again!" to the horrors of ethnic cleansing. Ethnic cleansing was a horror when it was practiced on Native Americans forced to walk the Trail of Tears. Ethnic cleansing was a horror when it was practiced on Jews, Gypsies and other victims of the Nazis during the Holocaust. It was a horror when it was practiced during the darkest days of apartheid in South Africa. Ethnic cleansing remains a horror whenever we find it being practiced anywhere in the world. And ethnic cleansing remains a horror when Israel practices it against Palestinians today.
I lived as best I could, and then I died.
Be careful where you step: the grave is wide.
—Michael R. Burch, "Epitaph for a Palestinian Child"
Margaret Atwood has formally opposed Israel's eviction of Palestinians and Bedouins by signing an open letter addressed to Israeli and Canadian leaders. Dr. Gabor Maté, a Jewish Holocaust survivor, calls such evictions "nothing but ethnic cleansing" and says "One thing I've learned is you don't be quiet when things happen that shouldn't happen."
You can read Margaret Atwood's article "The Shadow Over Israel" below. As she points out, Israel's horrendous treatment of Palestinians "haunts everything" in the region, and a brutal military occupation that denies writing paper and pizza to innocent children and their mothers can only be seen by the equality-loving people of the free world as being incredibly unfair, cruel, petty and vindictive. Jimmy Carter made a similar observation when he saw children in Gaza being denied coloring books and crayons. How can an advanced nation like Israel be so petty, so vindictive, so cruel?
You can also read a poignant letter written by Palestinian students who live in Gaza, imploring Atwood to take a firm stand against what they called "the brutal, hermetic, medieval siege that Israel is perpetrating against us, the 1.5 million Palestinians of the Gaza Strip."
Reference: http://www.thehypertexts.com/Margaret%20Atwood%20Palestinians%20Nakba%20Holocaust.htm