Israel Tries to Change the Subject from Genocide to Iran
The Netanyahu Government Looks for a Means of Drawing Attention Away from Its Abundant Failures
Just as the genocide of the Palestinians was going on long before the events of Oct. 7, so the Iranian attack on Israel of April 13-14 has much history behind it. Iran’s projectile barrage on Israel came in response to many provocations, but especially to the Israeli bombing of the Iranian Embassy in Damascus on April 1. The attack killed 13 people including three Iranian Generals. The Israeli attack of April 1st was calculated to set a trap that would lead to a wider regional war that Netanyahu has long been seeking.
All signs point to the probability that the West’s most spoiled and coddled Chosenites, the people and government of Israel, are going to be allowed to get away with yet another travesty. The Netanyahu government is in the process of entrapping the Islamic Republic of Iran into a round of Russian roulette that is putting at risk the future of all life on Earth.
Iran currently tops the list of defamed and misrepresented countries consistently smeared by Zionist media that inundates the world with increasingly vile forms of Western propaganda.
By and large, both the most brazen as well as the closeted fans of Israel’s US-backed genocidal assault on Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, are also supportive of the Zionist preoccupation with bringing about a war of mass annihilation targeting Iran. Iran is a country of 90 million people, many of them highly educated. Iran is the contemporary geopolitical expression of the Persian heritage that played a major role in the history of both Judaism and Western Civilization.
The government of Iran has gathered around it several Islamic polities devoted to the defence of the Palestinian population now facing genocidal extermination. The Israel-US genocide is being pressed forward with the willing backing of a large portion of Western leaders, Christian Zionists and Jewish Israelis.
The partners in the Iranian-led Resistance include Hezbollah, the Houthi leadership of Yemen, the elected government of Syria and many militia groups in Iraq. This mobilized coalition was the object of much cultivation of martial knowhow and organization.
Prominent among those that cultivated this Axis of Resistance was the Iranian Revolutionary Guard General, Qassem Soleimani. As Times’ interest in him suggests, General Soleimani’s appeal sometimes transcended geopolitical, ideological and religious boundaries. Some saw him as a kind of international icon of professional soldiering at its finest.
On the orders of US President Donald Trump, Qassem Soleimani was assassinated while on a diplomatic mission in Baghdad in early 2020. The US and Israeli governments regularly assassinate Iranian military figures and scientists, a pattern that was part of the process that led to the Islamic Republic’s strike aimed at Israel on the night of April 13-14.
For many years Benjamin Netanyahu has been seeking to persuade the US government to go to war with Iran, a country whose strength and viability presents an obstacle to the Likudnik vision of a more expansive Israel capable of dominating the Arab populations of the Middle East.
Iran’s internal coherence has prevented Israel from transforming the polity into the kind of rubble that has been inflicted by attacks directed at Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and now the Gaza Strip. I have visited Iran several times between 2014 and 2019. It is not a utopia but Iran has become a going concern as a regional superpower that provides fairly decent lives for most of its citizens.
One of Iran’s increasingly conspicuous means of defending itself from the hostility of of its main nemesis, nuclear-armed Israeli, is its technological mastery of the arts and sciences of making missiles. Iran has shared this means of expressing military muscle with its Axis of Resistance partners including prominently Hezbollah and the Houthis.
Since October 7 the Houthis used drone technology to effectively assert control over shipping in the Red Sea. The Houthis are engaged in a very clear attempt to enforce the terms of the UN’s Genocide Convention on Israel and its backers. The Houthis have gone beyond the war of words to actively oppose the actions of those engaged in imposing the death sentence of genocide on the people of Gaza.
As Simplicius explains in his Substack post in The Garden of Knowledge, the Iranian projectile attack on Israel was mounted according to the terms of the UN Charter. It allows for the expression of self-defence after, for instance, Israel bombed the Iranian Embassy in Damascus Syria on April 1st.
While Israel boasted it had stopped virtually all of the projectiles, Simplicius interprets the manoeuvre as primarily a test to see if the high speed ballistic missiles—potentially hypersonic missiles— could penetrate Israeli air space. It turns out they can!
In addressing that issue Simplicus writes,
while Israel and the U.S. claim they shot down 100% of everything, and while it’s possible that the drone and cruise missile lures were mostly shot down—though we have no strong evidence one way or the other—we do have evidence that the ballistic missiles largely went unopposed, slicing through what’s claimed to be the densest air defense in the world.
The main ballistic missiles strikes to hit Israel military targets took place at the Navatim Airbase in the Negev region. The Iranians gave ample warning to many parties in Israel and its neighbouring countries that a host of projectiles were on their way.
The report by Simplicius notes that the Iranian scientists engaged in this project took advantage of the events of April 13-14 to record and evaluate Israeli systems for stopping projectiles. If the projectile assault had been more aggressive, it might have resulted in Israeli deaths which would have given the Netanyahu government an excuse to answer militarily Iran’s justified response to the Iranian Embassy bombing.
It must be stressed once again that the unfolding sequence of Israel-Iran strikes, retaliations and possibly counterstrikes has its origins in the bombing of Iran’s Embassy in Damascus by the Netanyahu government. An attack on a national embassy is treated in international law as an assault on the sovereign territory of the violated country. Such an attack represents a very clear violation of the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. In a sense, Iran had no choice but to retaliate in order to maintain its credibility as a serious power capable of exercising “deterrence.”
The Israeli bombing of the Iranian Embassy was a strike not only against Iran and Syria but it was also an assault on the whole complex of diplomatic relations supporting the ethos of civility in international relations. The two-week IDF campaign at the Al-Shifa Hospital is illustrative of another plunge to the bottom, a violation undermining the norms of decent human behaviour together with the most basic principles of human rights and the rule of law.
British Diplomat Craig Murray, who played a significant role in the genesis of South Africa’s charge against Israel at the World Court, expresses his extreme alarm at the apparent collapse of international law epitomized by the ongoing Gaza genocide. A younger colleague picks up on Murray’s points, emphasizing the symbolic significance of a violent attack by one nation on the embassy of another nation.
This genocide just seems to become more and more grotesque as death by bombardment gives way to accelerating death by forced famine. This weaponization of forced starvation gained momentum with the attack by Israel and its backers against the UN’s Relief and Works Agency, UNRWA. In fact Israel’s goal remains the destruction of UNRWA, the most experienced and well equipped deliverer of humanitarian aid.
The Israeli massacre of Palestinians is being matched by the Israeli murder of international aid workers as well as many dozens of journalists. It has been matched by the notorious massacre of hundreds of medical practitioners and patients at the Al-Shifa Hospital and at all of Gaza’s other hospitals.
No doubt there are many parties that welcome a shift in the narrative from the day-to-day horrors of the Gaza massacre to the optics of Israel-Iran-US relations with the usual consternation about how Joe Biden has made himself into Benjamin Netanyahu’s chump. It is important not to lose focus on the genocidal assault fuelling this descent into madness.
It is important to maintain some focus on the Gaza genocide whose new stage is coming to be dominated by the mass starvation which could see Palestinian deaths increase very quickly from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands.
There are a lot of Jewish Israelis who want to see all humanitarian supplies, but especially food, being cut off altogether to the Gazan inmates of the Israeli death camp. Film maker Jeffrey Loffredo gained the confidence of some Israeli citizens and was able to capture many of their candid remarks about their support for the genocide.
The people he filmed have been working closely with IDF soldiers to accelerate the genocidal kill off. The genocidal intent of the Israeli leadership seems to run wide and deep throughout larger body of Jewish citizens.
To round out this presentation I am ending it with a compelling discussion between a prominent Iranian academic, Mohammad Marandi, and Ali Abunimah, Director of the Electronic Intifada. Professor Maranda explains how, when the Ayatollah Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini first came to power in 1979, he broke off relations with the government of Israel and opened relations with Yasser Arafat of the Palestinian Liberation Organization. Moreover Ayatollah Khomeini broke off relations with the White Minority government of South Africa and opened relations with the African National Congress, Nelson Mandela’s group.
This history has come full circle since the present post-apartheid government of South Africa pressed charges at the International Court of Justice against the genocidal government of Israel.
Unlimited capacity for hypocrisy seems to be 'the way of the west'. Here's Canadian political reaction to the Iranian response, from the Epoch Times.
“Canada unequivocally condemns Iran’s airborne attacks against Israel. We stand with Israel. After supporting Hamas’ brutal October 7 attack, the Iranian regime’s latest actions will further destabilize the region and make lasting peace more difficult,” the Prime Minster’s Office said in a statement on April 13.
“In this difficult time, we stand with Israel, the Israeli people and Jewish communities in Canada and abroad,” Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly wrote on social media platform X. “These unprecedented attacks from Iran will only serve to further destabilize the region. It must stop.”
Mr. Poilievre expressed the Official Opposition’s similar stance. “I unequivocally condemn the brazen attack launched on Israel by the Iranian regime, ....”
How do those strong condemnations compare to their responses to the Israeli attack on the Iranian embassy, the numerous Israeli attacks on Syria, and most obviously, the ongoing utter merciless cruelty of Israel vs the Palestinians and anyone on the ground helping them?
Eleni sent this interview with Michael Hudson about the conduct of the war against Palestinians, which is patterned as the war against the Vietnamese people was patterned during that war, based upon the systems analysis paradigm of Physicist, Herman Kahn, who was the inspiration for "Dr. Strangelove" in that movie, and explored the theory of "winnable" nuclear war, as well as the "Strategic Hamlets" initiative in Vietnam. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Kahn
Kahn was a founding member of the Hudson Institute, and also worked as a military analyst and strategist at the similar Rand Corporation. Michael Hudson was brought into the Hudson institute after the publication of his expose book, Super Imperialism in 1972. This was adopted as an operations manual for US global currency policy, as it portrayed the $US as being supported more by the necessity of buying oil and other trade items in $US, than by the gold backing, which had just been "suspended", as the US ran out of gold.
Hudson, therefore attended many high level strategic meetings with Kahn over a period of several years. He describes Kahn's analysis of the interventions necessary to destroy the system which supports people in a society. This included removing people from communities and putting them into tightly controlled compounds, "Strategic hamlets", which Israel has done with Gaza, and also the isolation of West Bank Palestinian communities from each other.
"Killing all of the journalists" was a lesson learned by the US during the Vietnam War, when diffusion of actual knowledge of the horrors of war ruined societal support for the war. ("Hey, hey, LBJ, How many kids did you kill today?") This is being carried out in Gaza and the Palestinian West Bank villages. Destruction of hospitals and of food supplies is critical. The message to humanitarian organizations to "go back home" was very effectively conveyed by the killing of 7 aid workers by 3 waves of drone attacks, until they were all dead and burned. Ships turned around. The mission closed down. Aid Workers, Hospitals and Doctors are at the "top of the target list" with Journalists.
The US promptly stopped funding for UNRWA, based on a few tortured confessions from UNRWA workers in Israeli prisons, and has blocked it until 2025, despite that background being revealed.
All of this is to make it impossible to live in Gaza, and to enforce death by starvation, which is less dramatic than bombing, upon all the Palestinians who will not leave.
Israel is the US/Western "aircraft carrier:" in the oil-producing Mideast, which LBJ (and others) have said "would have to be invented if it did not exist".
Hudson explores the threat to global oil supply and prices, if Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, and how the US/Israel/West might be able to prevent that, such as by developing a pretext for massive attacks upon Iran, perhaps nuclear. Currently, Iran is being careful to avoid providing such a pretext for nuclear attack, after the provocation of the Israeli bombing of the Iranian embassy in Damascus Syria last week.
The upshot is that this is the same coordinated policy as in Vietnam, and has been continuous in Israel/Palestine since the meetings Hudson attended during the Nixon administration in the early 1970s. The window-dressing for the American and western public is propaganda, and it is not effectively overriding the actual images people see, but it is delaying any real action to stop the genocide, while the starvation, bombing and destruction of all support-systems grinds forward.
Hudson points out that the only currently anti-war candidate running for POTUS is the Green Party Candidate, Jill Stein MD..
He discusses the plans to convert Gaza to an Israeli luxury development, with piers for yachts, installed by Americans. These purport to carry in food, but that is not happening.
Hudson reports Israeli deals with India for construction after the expulsion of Palestinians. He reports that the lack of money in supporting Palestinians helps drive the genocide.
The imperial project, as he lays it out, is the successful financialization of Genocide.
PROF. MICHAEL HUDSON, THE TRUTH ABOUT THE DESTRUCTION OF GAZA.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNu_OGbqyWk