Jail Time for Questioning Covid Crimes in Alberta?
Will Dr. William Makis or the Covidian Culprits Go to Jail? A Revised Edition of "Will Albertan's Smith Government Survive the Lies and Crimes of the AHS"
The Humpty Dumpty Narrative - There's No Way To Put It Back Together Again
The Covid-is-a-novel-bat-pangolin-mystery-out-of-nowhere-but-don’t-you-worry-about-a-thing-because-we-are-the-Science-and-it’s-all-clear-to-us-that-vaccines-and-remdesivir-and-ventilators-and-masking-and-lockdowns-will-save-us-as-long-as-you-shut-your-minds-down-and-accept-whatever-we-tell-you-and-submerge-yourself-and-your-own-best-interests-to-us-for-we-are-indescribably-wise-and-working-solely-for-you-and-your-survival narrative is cracking wide open.
And there is, quite literally, no way to put it back together again. Ding Dong, the very wicked internationally coordinated witch is dead.
Looking out at the World from Canada is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Subscribed
What Needs To Happen Next?
by Tony Hall
It seems Humpty Dumpty can’t be put back together again. Nevertheless, we must try to make sense of what has already happened in order get a handle on what should happen and what needs to happen if humanity is to survive the assault we are experiencing.
This essay continues the narrative published in the two prior contributions to this Substack. The first, dated Dec. 4, is entitled “The Jab-Pushing Government of Danielle Smith in Alberta.” The second, dated Dec. 7, is entitled “Premier Smith, Dr. Makis, and the Genetic Manipulation of Humans.”
Before plunging ahead with news and views on the injection controversies still swirling around inside and outside Alberta, let’s take a moment to reflect on the biggest story in the world over the last few days. I refer to the weird politics of regime change in Syria.
There are many meanings that can be read into the remaking of Syria by a number of Islamist organizations all derived from al-Qeada. Al-Qaeda was created and backed in the 1980s by the CIA as part of the effort to create an Islamic mercenary army to overthrow the Soviet-backed puppet regime in Afghanistan.
Al-Qaeda and its offshoots, including the so-called HTS, are suddenly being depicted by much of the Western media as the good guys. These supposed good guys, however, are still categorized by the US and Canadian governments as terrorists.
https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/black-flag-over-damascus/
The leader, Muhammad Al-Jawlani, is still a marked man with a $10 million bounty on his head put there by the US State Department. In spite of this damning feature of Al-Jawlani’s very unusual CV, he is presently acting with US and Israeli approval as Syria’s “new strongman.”
How revealing that the core group being backed by the US and Israeli enemies of the vanquished Assad government, is still tagged by the US government as the main Islamic organization responsible for the atrocities that took place in Manhattan and at the Pentagon on 9/11.
Without any investigation whatsoever, Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda were wrongly depicted on the very day of Sept. 11, 2001 as the culprits responsible for the explosive events. Now this more recent incarnation of al-Qaeda, the supposed “masterminds” of 9/11, form the basis of the proxy forces being entrusted with remaking Syria.
But where does Alberta figure into all this? Albertans, Syrians and all the rest of the world’s peoples are currently living through unusually volatile times. In this volatility many jurisdictions and institutions will inevitably disappear. As the fate of Syria exemplifies, polities we have lived with for years can suddenly vanish, only to be replaced without any consultation or consent by those most affected.
Maybe all life forms, including us humans, will disappear all at once. Nuclear Holocaust is far more imminent now that at any other time in human history.
As we try to navigate our way through the momentous upheavals developing around us, we cannot count on the big media venues to help us make sense of it all. In fact we often have to deal with onslaughts of lies and misrepresentations by those pretending to be honest witnesses in describing the transformations underway in our changing world.
How many have died or have been rendered disabled or ill, by disinformation assuring people that the Covid injections pushed our way, are “safe and effective”? The injections certainly aren’t safe but they have been hyper-effective at harming many of us in devastating ways.
Alberta’s Awkward Colonial Status in the Imperial Dominion of Canada
Nothing takes place in a vacuum including the 28 October meeting in Red Deer that forms the primary focus of this essay. On the way to my account of this very important meeting, I’ll introduce a few observations on Alberta’s history and character. These reflections on background and context, character and circumstance, help set the stage for the narrative I’m in the process of composing.
Alberta is a province wherein a significant minority are giving serious consideration to altering our geopolitical relations with the rest of Canada and North America. The atrocious failures and corruptions of the Justin Trudeau government in Ottawa have underlined for many Albertans how deeply-rooted are the structural factors that have prevented this province from living up to its full potential.
The province of Alberta remains entrapped as a subordinate colony still being exploited in the imperial dominion established in 1867 when Canada was modelled to maintain and boost the role of the British Empire in North America.
https://albertaprosperityproject.com/history/
The uneasy relationship between the national and Alberta governments in Canada has been marked since the Canadian Parliament created the new province in 1905. This troubled relationship has been highlighted and addressed by many organizations. These organizations include the Social Credit Party of Alberta in the 1930s, the Western Canada Concept Party in the 1980s, and a series of organizations after 2004 known sequentially as the Separation Party, the Alberta First Party, the Freedom Conservative Party of Alberta, and the Wildrose Independence Party of Alberta.
https://efpublic.elections.ab.ca/efParty.cfm?MID=FP_11&PID=11
The Alberta Prosperity Project , founded by Dr. Dennis Modry, is not a political party. Rather the APP is an innovative public education initiative. Its core narrative— its curriculum— highlights various scenarios for achieving greater sovereignty for Alberta and Albertans through a range of possible scenarios and tactics.
Alberta’s grievances directed at Ottawa have also sparked some political fire works on the federal side of the equation. Preston Manning, Stockwell Day, Stephen Harper, Ezra Levant and Prof. Tom Flanagan are all prominent among the activists that have driven this Conservative trajectory of political activism at the level of Canada’s national government.
Prof. Flanagan is the neocon political scientist at the University of Calgary who inspired in some of his students in his legendary classes, the fighting spirit displayed by many of Alberta’s top politicians. These Albertans in federal politics have significantly altered the face of Canada’s political culture.
https://thewalrus.ca/the-man-behind-stephen-harper/
In the final analysis, however, much of the energy invested by Alberta politicians in the national government was co-opted by the voting clout exercised by those inhabiting Canada’s largest population centres in Ontario and Quebec. Stephen Harper, the Conservative Party Prime Minister of Canada from 2006 to 2015, was co-opted on multiple fronts. He stands accused of betraying the political economy of Alberta by signing Canada up in 2015 to the UN’s unrealistic “sustainable development” objectives.
https://canucklaw.ca/agenda-2030-un-sustainable-development-wealth-transfer-scheme/
According to The Economist, the UN’s Agenda 2030 on sustainable development is so “sprawling, unwieldy and misconceived” that “the entire enterprise is set up to fail.”
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2015/03/26/the-169-commandments
Before getting roped into the UN’s so-called “sustainable development” objectives, Harper came up with the metaphor of placing a fire wall around Alberta. A core aspect of Harper’s proposal in 2001 to Alberta’s Premier Ralph Klein, was to follow Quebec’s example of taking control of its own pension funds. Harper indicated that Alberta should take over the administration of its citizens’ own share of the national pension fund still managed by Ottawa.
https://albertapolitics.ca/wp-content/uploads/firewall.pdf
This unfinished business may be integral to the recent job extended to Harper by the Danielle Smith government around the time of United Conservative Party’s (UCP’s) Annual General Meeting in early November. Harper was appointed Chair of the Alberta Investment Management Company (AIMCo’s). AIMCo is responsible for taking care of the province’s near-$200 billion nest egg.
The fund is composed of several pension funds belonging to the province’s employees. The fund also includes Alberta’s ever-controversial Heritage Savings Trust Fund.
Questions have been raised about whether Harper might be in some conflicts of interest involving his many self-owned businesses as well as his extensive networks of partners, customers, and investors. Other questions are being asked about whether or not Harper will be independent in his investment decisions or whether he will be subject to political pressures from officials and friends of the provincial government.
Even more relevant to the main subject matter of this essay is the fact that some skeptics, including Dr. William Makis, suspect that the UCP government has been altered by some sort of “internal coup” as possibly evidenced by the seemingly sudden arrival of Harper in a high-profile role at Premier Smith’s side.
Much of the tension in recent years between the governments led by Premier Smith and Prime Minister Trudeau has to do with the divide between the two levels of government when it comes to implementing the UN’s “sustainable development” objectives.
The UN goals have been deviously manipulated by Justin Trudeau to undermine the vitality of Alberta’s oil and gas industry. The other side of the federal distain for Alberta’s energy sector, is eastern Canada’s propensity to exploit the wealth generated by oil and gas for many national projects, including transfer payments to “equalize” the standard of living in Quebec and the Maritime provinces.
As far as I know, Harper has never had to answer to this day for inflicting the UN’s Agenda 2030 on Canada in ways that Trudeau tries to exploit by appointing himself energy czar of Alberta’s oil and gas operations. Trudeau’s greenwashed netzero government is so reviled in Alberta that it has only elected 2 of 34 Alberta MPs in the Canadian House of Commons.
One of these two MP’s, Randy Boissonnault, was recently forced to resign from Trudeau’s scandal-infested Cabinet as Minister of Employment. The former Minister had been exposed for dishonestly identifying himself as an Indigenous person.
All Roads Lead to Red Deer
In the last contribution to this series of essays published on this Substack, I reported on Dr. William Makis’ career with some focus on his presentation at the UCP’s June 17 event, the Injection of Truth. Dr. Makis was one of six Canadian presenters invited to speak at this assembly organized by the UCP’s Calgary Lougheed Constituency Association.
In my concluding remarks in the Dec. 7 essay, I drew attention to the October 28 event in Red Deer where Dr. Makis and other presenters explained their dissatisfaction with Premier Smith’s handling of the first half of her term in Alberta’s top job.
Some of my reflections in the opening sections of this essay are intended to explain something about the historical background of the October 28 dissidents’ meeting and the Nov. 1-2 Annual General Meeting of the UCP. From my perspective, the Oct. 28 dissidents’ meeting can be pictured as an outgrowth of a heritage marking Alberta as a springboard for all manner of malcontents and visionaries seeking either to improve Canada’s Confederation or to exit from it.
At the Oct. 28 meeting in a large Christian School complex on the outskirts of Red Deer, about 300 individuals assembled to listen to presentations from dissidents unhappy with Danielle Smith’s performance as premier. About 20 individuals were invited to speak at the event opened by the remarks of William Makis.
The twenty presenters who had their turns speaking on the podium, provided a variety of reality checks. In my view these contributions enhanced the quality of the AGM review vote that was about to take place at the UCP AGM five days later. The massive AGM was largely organized to spotlight and laud the achievements of Premier Smith and her large Cabinet.
Except for the discussion of policy proposals from the UCP’s Constituency Associations, no serious forum was included in the AGM for ad hoc interventions from the membership, interventions that might have included critical perspectives on Premier Smith’s policies and actions.
The Oct. 28 event can be seen as a corrective to failure of the organizers of the AGM to make space for critical feedback from UCP members. The gathering days before the AGM provided a platform for critics of Premier Smith’s leadership to explain their positions in a relaxed, attentive and supportive setting. The event was entitled The Arrival of Accountability.
As substantial as was the process of dissidents’ criticism, I could not say that I was seeing a government-in-waiting with sufficient competence and unity of purpose to take over from the Danielle Smith Team. But it seemed to me I was seeing the makings of some important chapters to come in contests over how to lead and guide Canada’s most resource-rich and fast-growing province.
Clearly one of the expectations of the organizers was to persuade those who attended the event to vote NO on the ballot question of whether or not to renew Premier Smith’s mandate to lead the UCP Party. As it would turned out, 91.5% of the voters at the AGM said YES, the premier’s mandate should continue. Premier Smith easily won in the review by an impressive plurality.
The fact remains, however, that several hundred UCP members voted that Premier Smith should not be renewed. From what I could see at The Arrival of Accountability event, some of us who voted NO were anxious to help fix the policies and improve the actions of the governing party.
It would make no sense for the dissidents to look towards the NDP to act on the grievances especially in the health field. The provincial NDP has show itself to be especially authoritarian when it comes to subordinating itself to the AHS and to the globalist directives it receives from Justin Trudeau, the World Health Organization and the World Economic Forum.
Moreover, I think Dave Parker of Take Back Alberta, one of the agencies sponsoring the event, has made a strong case in the past condemning the option of forming small dissident parties each trying to build up a larger constituency from scratch. Too much energy has been expended in Alberta on this kind of quixotic strategy which usually leads nowhere.
Even before attending the Oct. 28 meeting it seemed possible that the outcome might be to create a niche for organized internal dissent within the UCP Party. Why not create some sort of formal caucus within the UCP starting with some of those, such as myself, who voted NO to Premier Smith in the review of her leadership?
Not surprisingly, Dr. Makis used his time on the podium to highlight the malfeasance of Alberta Health Services. The outspoken critic of Danielle Smith pointed to the study of the AHS ordered by Jason Kenney before the UCP Premier of Alberta was squeezed from office in late 2021.
Kenney resigned with just over a 50% approval rating in his review by UCP members. His rejection by almost half of his UCP constituents came about because of widespread revulsion generated by his COVID policies. Was Kenney blackmailed into compliance? Kenney’s policies were essentially the same as those promoted by Justin Trudeau, Rachel Notley, the WEF and the WHO.
According to Makis, the report on the AHS by Ernst and Young indicated that that the AHS could do away with about 2000 of it 3000 managers without significant reductions in service.
The Arrival of Accountability event on Oct. 28 began with reports from two doctors. The second medical practitioner to speak was Dr. Christopher Shoemaker whose medical license has been taken away from him by the Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Dr. Shoemaker is regularly fact checked for speaking now-widely recognized truths concerning, for instance, how the injections attack the immune systems of recipients.
Such evidence-based assertions regularly elicit sanctimoniously-delivered contradictions from fake so-called “fact checkers” like Marisha Goldhammer. On behalf of Agence France Presse Canada, Ms. Goldhammer asserted in July of 2023, “public health agencies say the jabs are safe and effective, and that the spike proteins they generate are not dangerous.” Yah… sure.
How many people might have died because they took the jab based on unfounded assurances provided by the likes of Goldhammer at AFP Canada? When will there be legal accountability for the role of the media in disseminating disinformation that influenced people to make the wrong life-and-death decision concerning the supposed safety of the injections? When will the publishers of fraudulent fact checking issues apologize for their role in helping to herd some members of their audience into Covidian slaughter houses?
https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33NQ7CX
Dr. Shoemaker’s very lucid and professional presentation helped initiate for me a cathartic reaction that is part of the reason I decided to embark on authoring this series of essays.
I found nothing to criticize in Dr. Shoemaker’s clear explanation of some of the serious harms being done to human health by the gene-modifying mRNA/lipid nanoparticle injections initially justified as remedies for COVID-19.
I have seen this very logical approach replicated many times. The medical critics of the handling of the WHO-declared pandemic often go into great detail describing the many-faceted disasters frequently wrought by the sometimes lethal injections. The few remain doctors worthy of the name sometimes put themselves at great risk by bringing to light many of the strategic truths that we the people must integrate and navigate to avert the dangers now maliciously woven into our degraded public health systems.
But it is also important to take the discussion further.
What often gets left out from this style of diagnosing health effects, is moving along in the analysis from explanations of what is being done to us to descriptions of why so much damage is being perpetrated. Are the assaults on health the result of mistakes and incompetence, or are we seeing the outcomes of a purposeful agenda meant to cause extreme harm to much of humanity?
Understandably many will hold back from arriving at such harsh conclusions. A natural inclination is to err on the side of caution and generosity. If one can only see the bare outlines of what has transpired, one might naturally assume that the main causes of the devastation are mistakes which would naturally proliferate in the context of such an unprecedented global plague.
In my view we need to encourage people to let go of their naivety when it comes to facing up to the magnitude of the crimes that are still being perpetrated in our midst. We need to get real about the reality that we are dealing with a war on all branches of humanity. We need to demand some genuine accountability from our governments, from our law enforcement agency, from our universities and especially from the legions of “fact check” liars that continue to dominate our (((media))).
Let’s say that those of us who see malicious intention in the Covidian power grab are correct. If the plan is indeed to shrink humanity’s numbers and to enfeeble us in ways that make it easier to manipulate and control us, shouldn’t we become more resolute in breaking the hard news to people still unsure of what is behind the public health disaster.
That news is that “the infliction of deceptions, injuries, sterilization and deaths is intentional. The harms are done deliberately.”
Shouldn’t we become more insistent in persuading those who agree with us, not to hold back from speaking the hard truths to power in our personal and public communications? It is no exaggeration to emphasize that most of humanity is currently snared, whether they realize it or not, in fatal webs of entanglement with hungry spiders just waiting to feast further on our our demise.
I did not hear at The Arrival of Accountability event a single clear and compelling assessment of the reasons for the assault on human health. If malicious intention is motivating an unprecedented and mammoth crime against humanity, who is most responsible and what should be done to bring the guilty to justice?
Is there really a plan to kill us and maim us? If such a plan exists, what can we expect next? We need to get more specific about what is happening on the ground, including inside the UCP Party. There is no doubt that the current leadership has decided to look the other way by accepting the worst features of AHS control.
The importance of the larger issue coalesced for me in an instant following a brief episode during the conclusion of Dr. Shoemaker’s presentation where he was reaching for an appropriate term to adorn the conclusion of his presentation. He tried to come up with a term to describe the nature of the injections shooting so much devastation our way. I found myself silently urging the presenter to articulate the term “bioweapon” as a fitting description of the devices being deployed to decimate us.
Not only is the injected concoction NOT a vaccine. It is NOT a medical remedy designed to stop a viral contagion. That deception has yet to be decisively exposed to a confused public. The COVID-19 clot shots were not formulated as a remedy for any health ailment. The gene-modifying mRNA, lipid nanoparticle concoctions were created under the auspices of the US Department of Defence as a bioweapon conceived with the aim of eliminating and harming people worldwide.
https://expose-news.com/2023/02/06/us-dod-is-running-the-vaccine-fraud/
When the presentations of Drs. Makis and Shoemaker were done, a moderator stepped onto the podium to ask the speakers questions on behalf of the audience. I put up my hand wanting to ask Dr. Shoemaker why he had not said the word “bioweapon.” Instead of having the chance to ask a question that might have taken me two or three seconds to fire off, the audience (including me) got a lecture on why no questions from the floor would be entertained given the limits of the available time.
The next thing I knew, my acquaintance, Marco Van Huigenbos, was tapping me on the shoulder from behind. I think he was trying to catch my attention with the goal of preventing me from creating an embarrassing episode. We agreed on the spot to talk about it, which we did when we left the auditorium to reach the other side of the glass doors.
As the conversation got going I fixed on my frustrations with the constraints I regularly see preventing candid, open, and honest discussion in public venues about who and what is behind the bioweapon attacks on our lives, our health, and our civil liberties.
In my experience, it is one thing to discuss this power grab with friends and colleagues. But the obstacles become more formidable when it comes to on-the-record presentations that go beyond the issue of enumerating the harms being done by the toxic injections. The stakes become much higher when presentations go on to describe the big picture.
Such descriptions of the ongoing crimes against humanity include naming some of the individuals as well as the public and private institutions behind the assaults on our health, our economies, our social cohesion, and our overall wellbeing. This list of disruptive incursions is far from complete.
Dr. Makis frequently names names in his presentations almost daring those being so identified to sue him. In so doing, Dr. Makis conveys a sense that he is well on top of the evidence that causes him to make his serious accusations. As I see it, Dr. Makis is doing a courageous and erudite public service with broad implications that extend far beyond Alberta and far beyond his narrow specialties. In fact the reach of his analysis goes far beyond anything I’ve so far seen from whistle blowers in Alberta.
Of course there are strong legal and political reasons to hold back from describing the jab-related atrocities as crimes that call for criminal investigations, charges and appropriate punishments. Under current circumstances, however, how likely is this outcome to happen? Are there credible law enforcement officials in Alberta and elsewhere gearing up to hold the criminal culprits accountable?
What is to be made of the judiciary? After almost a decade of Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party appointments, most judges throughout Canada are now deeply implicated as politicized agents that helped enable and facilitate many aspects of the Covidian crime sprees.
Under these conditions, how can judges objectively evaluate the crimes in which some of the judiciary is deeply implicated? Who is in a position to assess and arbitrate the culpability of judges in the genesis of the Covidian fiasco? What should be the role of citizens’ arrest and citizens’ arbitration if the responsible authorities continue to demean themselves and their institutions by pretending that they have had nothing to do with the implementation and effects of the Covidian crime spree?
Without this kind of frank acknowledgment of the litanies of racketeering underway, how will it be possible to generate the kind of serious and well focused responses our imperilled conditions require? Without responses that hold the guilty parties accountable, how will the ongoing crimes against humanity be stopped? How can we counter the tendency to normalize criminality when it happens again and again without accountability?
When I look back on The Arrival of Accountability event, I am struck by the failure to address systematically the crucial legal dimensions of Premier Smith’s obvious submission to the AHS. Dr. Makis has made the legal nature of the Smith-AHS interactions an important theme of many of his reports. What his reports expose is that the AHS is overseeing in one branch of an emerging worldwide network of medical practitioners granted a license to kill in the name of public health.
Dr. Makis’ view is that Premier Smith has been intimidated and cowed into submission to the AHS based on her understandable fear of the legal weaponry available to the organization. This view, however, can be seen as a double-edged sword. When Premier Smith refused to block the AHS’s injection policies, including the promotion aimed at injecting the mRNA/lipid nanoparticles into six-month old babies, she allowed herself to be placed on very thin legal ice.
Dr. Makis is far from alone in seeing the AHS as an agency deeply embedded in the serial criminality whose ascendance accelerated since the inception of the manufactured COVID crisis.
AHS is an important partner of the World Health Organization and the World Economic Forum in promoting the now-discredited advertising campaign for the kleptocratic “Great Reset.”
In the long run the criminal nature of the AHS’s policies and behaviour will cast a long shadow over Alberta governments until someone in a position of top authority choses to say enough is enough. Why can’t Premier Smith be that person? Why can’t Premier Smith face squarely, rather than run away from, the kind of allegations Dr. Makis has made available to the people and government of Alberta?
Dave Parker, Take Back Alberta, Premier Danielle Smith and the Politics of the Law
At The Arrival of Accountability event there was an important session on the state of the professional association of lawyers and judges in Alberta. What I saw in this event is evidence that efforts are underway to do to the members of the legal profession damage similar to the assault on the medical profession especially through the dictates of the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons.
It seems that the professional associations of lawyers and of judges are being pressured to make their policies conform to the woke assertions of the principles of Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity, DIE. Someone on hight has passed down the verdict the DIE should prevail in how our laws and policies are to be interpreted and enforced. To me this analysis represented the delivery of some very bad news as delivered by Lani Rouillard and Katherine Kowalchuk of Lawyers 4 Truth as well as from Roger Song of the Council of Alberta Lawyers.
Among the politicians invited to hold forth on the main themes of Accountability were Drew Barnes, Rick Strankman, and Art Hanger. Together they wove together a fabric of commentary highlighting interactions between history and contemporary events in the Conservative and conservative politics of Alberta.
For me the final session was by far the richest and most significant component of the of the gathering. The first presenter was Dave Parker who continues to be a very high-profile member of the UCP. Dave Parker was instrumental in getting an organization known as Take Back Alberta (TBA) up and running.
I have heard Parker speak on behalf of TBA about 5 or 6 times. A big part of the story Dave Parker has to tell concerns his role in the events that led to the resignation of Jason Kenney as UCP Premier followed by the induction into the provincial government’s top job of now-Premier Danielle Smith. I recall that in the process of choosing a successor to Kenney, Parker repeatedly referred to Smith as a credible “freedom candidate.”
Parker’s main message is that our political system does make available ample provision for democratic procedures to those that are conscientious enough to show up at meetings and get themselves appointed or elected into positions great and small.
Parker frequently encourages members of his audiences to get positions on, for instance, school boards, library boards, university boards, and all manner of committees. Such committees are often the site of significant decision-making functions that take place outside the limelight.
Parker frequently condemns the majority of citizens who opt not to get involved in politics while they loudly complain about the failures of those in positions of leadership.
Dave Parker and his network of TBA friends and associates definitely got behind the candidacy of Danielle Smith. Smith adeptly took strategic advantage of this and other expressions of spontaneous community organizing by Alberta citizens who joined together in a multiplicity of fashions to lobby for the ascent of common sense over the prevailing Covidian madness.
As happened in many parts of the world, we found like-minded people in order to resist individually and collectively the unjustified masking, lock downs, school closures, jabs and mandated jabs forced on people in awkward spasms of government overreach.
Parker’s message affected me significantly. Beginning in 2020 I helped organize a local group in Lethbridge to resist the overreach. Several in our group heard Parker speak. He helped persuade us to have a look at the candidacy of Danielle Smith. When we did so, Smith established to our satisfaction that she knew what she was talking about when it came to evaluating the scores and scores of Covidian scams.
On Parker’s advice some of us joined the UCP and attended the annual meeting in Calgary in 2023. Wewere far from alone in this respect. At this stage the media was very critical of what Parker described to us as his “friendship” with Smith. In 2024 something changed significantly so that this friendship seemed to cross the line into animosity.
For sometime now, we have been getting news that the people at Elections Alberta have been trying to mire Parker in accusations and court procedures concerning alleged wrongdoing by TBA in and around the provincial election of 2022.
At first Parker indicated this harassment had its origins in what he said was the high level of influence exercised by the provincial NDP in Elections Alberta. At The Arrival of Accountability event, however, Parker announced that he had radically altered his interpretation of his legal difficulties.
Parker accused Premier Smith of using her influence to push for Parker’s criminalization in order to put him in jail and get him out of the way. In his presentation Parker made vague references to other scandalous features of Smith’s premiership. He did not, however, get explicit.
In his presentation Parker dropped the news that he did give up TBA’s mailing list to Elections Alberta, something he had earlier vowed he would not do.
Some might see Parker as a witness and a symbol of the commitments Smith made concerning promised changes to health care on her way to the premier’s job. At the UCP’s AGM on Nov. 1-2, Take Back Alberta passed out a pamphlet emphasizing this theme.
Who Is Going to Do Jail Time and Who is Going to Get Away With Murder?
Next to Dave Parker sat panel member Marco Van Huigenbos. The two of them were quite civil together in spite of their sometime intemperate words when Van Huigenbos was Chief Financial Officer of TBA. Van Huigenbos warmly greeted Parker’s analysis. Van Huigenbos built on the word picture painted by Parker. TBA’s former CFO alleged that Danielle Smith was in the process of setting aside many of the supporters that brought her to power.
Van Huigenbos went further. He said the Premier was trying to downgrade or eliminate altogether the UCP’s grass-roots organizations. In a choice between the health agenda of Dave Parker and the pension and Heritage Fund agenda of Stephen Harper, a former PM and a leader of Alberta’s powerful Christian Zionist constituency, what option would Premier Smith choose?
Marco Van Huigenbos is widely acknowledged as one of the leaders of the protests by Truckers and others at Coutts Alberta in early 2022. This protest ran simultaneously with the Truckers Freedom Convoy’s parking protest that took place in Ottawa. Along with Alex Van Herk and Gerhard Janzen, Marco has been convicted of one count of “mischief over $5,000.”
The three are to be sentenced on 9-10 of January. It seems that in Justin Trudeau’s Canada, mischief trials can be stretched out over years. Moreover, the penalties can be astronomical with punishments as high as 10 years. The vengeful policies of Trudeau’s completely partisan federal institutions, including the CBC, continues to arouse widespread consternation inside and outside Canada.
The positive reception to the analysis, policies and actions of the Freedom Convoy, especially internationally, contrast dramatically with the current Prime Minister Trudeau’s chronic Covidian dementia which is still being expressed in Canada’s politicized courts.
The mischief trials of Tamara Lich, Chris Barber, and Pat King of the Freedom Convoy have become a disreputable circus events marking the vindictiveness of Justin Trudeau and his Liberal Party judicial appointees. The trials mark a new low in the politicization of the tainted criminal justice system in Canada, a pattern of debasement that will probably be replicated in the sentencing of Van Huigenbos, Van Herk and Jensen.
Their mischievous punishment follows the outrageous jail sentencing in the Lethbridge Court House of the Coutts 2. Both Anthony Olienick and Chris Carbert received a 6-and-a-half-year criminal sentence from a judge after a jury found the accused NOT guilty of the main charge against them.
At The Arrival of Accountability event, Marco Van Huigenbos and Dave Parker joked together. They pictured Premier Smith’s as if she would be happy getting them both out of the way locked up in prison. The common themes in the experiences of both Van Huigenbos and Dave Parker illustrate the wide breadth of the implications of the government role in the promoting and mandating the clot shots.
In retrospect, those engaged in the activism of Freedom Convoy made a point in trying to get in the way of the high-level Covidian crimes committed by the likes of Justin Trudeau, Chrystia Freeland, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, and Anthony Fauci.
Will Anthony Fauci be pardoned by Joe Biden for his COVID crimes while Coutts 4 and then 2 were denied bail so that they were kept in prison for two years without being convicted of anything.
The Coutts 2 were then were sentenced to six-and-a-half year after a jury found them innocent of the main charge.
The Crown’s legal transgressions arising from the Coutts protest are deeply intertwined with the issues facing Premier Smith in her mishandling of public health issues and juridical issues addressed at The Arrival of Accountability event.
The manufactured COVID crisis continues to cast an extremely broad shadow over Alberta and many other jurisdictions. All the crimes against humanity that took place worldwide during the WHO-declared pandemic continues to constitute the systematically-neglected elephant that inhabits a major place in main theatre of global geopolitics.
Those who demonstrated at Coutts and at Ottawa were doing an important public service in a life-and-death situation that to this day is still being criminally misrepresented by most of the big media venues. Already in early 2022 some of the Truckers along with their supporters and allies were pointing to the lethal results that would probably flow from submitting to the injection of the mandated kill shots.
During the period of Danielle’s Smith’s journey to her status as the leader of the Party with the majority of seats in the Alberta Legislature, it is clear she was watching the public health crisis very closely. I was probably doing her own independent research on the subject rather than simply depend on MSM reports as many politicians do.
Danielle Smith had made herself an integral part of Alberta’s freedom movement where there was a broad understanding of the warning signs of the travesty in-the-making. Accordingly, by early 2022 Danielle Smith was likely well aware that the supposed COVID remedy would have lethal and injurious effects far beyond those of the real or imagined impact of the celebrity virus.
Given this background to her premiership, does Premier Smith really believe she can simply pretend not to notice the accumulating complex of unresolved issues integral to the relationship between the AHS, the Alberta Ministry of Justice, and the elected branch of the Alberta government?
The good news is that Dr. Makis has brought his formidable set of talents and skills to monitoring the situation of public health in Alberta. The bad news is that AHS is trying to jail Dr, Makis for his accusations.
If we are to have a trial in Alberta, why not make the subject of the litigation the substance of the accusations being made by Dr. Makis? Isn’t it time for top officials in Alberta in the judiciary, in the government, in the media, and in both political parties to take their heads out of the sand?
Surely such a process of investigation and arbitration would serve Albertans better than simply giving the AHS and the Premier’s Office a license aimed at making Dr. Makis shut up and go away. Are these outcomes being advanced by threatening Dr. Makis with jail time?
Will Dr. William Makis or the Covidian Culprits Go to Jail?
The persecution of doctors for staying true to their Hippocratic Oaths is apparently continuing in Alberta. That’s not a good look for the UCP government. Will Premier Smith continue to try to wash her hands of the controversy? For her to call Dr. Makis a “liar” hardly seems worthy of the responsibilities Premier Smith has taken on.
Isn’t it time for our premier to take the necessary steps in order to walk away from her current position between a rock and a hard place where her own actions have landed her?
AHS and the Ministry of Justice Work Together to Try to Ruin a Family in the Quest to Make Case Law on Mandatory Vaccines
What is the role of the Alberta Ministry of Justice in the effort to criminalize Dr. Makis?
The unhealthy nature of the connections between the AHS and the Alberta Ministry of Justice is deeply rooted and well established.
A very telling example of the dark side of this connection was on display between 2012 and 2021 in the gruesome effort to make case law with the goal of putting legal pressure on parents to vaccinate their children according to government dictates.
The desire was to construct a case that would produce in a judge’s ruling whose main message would be to clarify for parents how the need to bend to the will of the state in the raising their children. Parents were to be made to understand that they would be at risk of losing all their children if they did submit to government control over the mandating of vaccines.
David and Collet Stephan were selected as the objects of this scheme to create the case law sought ultimately by the pharmaceutical industry. David’s father had invented True Hope, a natural remedy that has enabled thousands of people with psychological challenges to get relief while avoiding pharmaceutical products.
https://www.truehope.com/about/the-truehope-story
Health Canada invested much effort in its ultimately frustrated effort to have True Hope removed from the market. The earlier effort also produced the manufactured spectacle of a show trial.
The youngest son of the Stephan couple died from maltreatment by the medical system, not of meningitis as claimed by the Crown prosecutors. Nevertheless, between 2012 and 2021 the couple faced three trials for “failing to provide the necessities of life.” This seeming benign phrase was used as a code used to mean that the parents in question failed to have their child vaccinated. Prosecutors wanted the parents punished for not treating a condition that, it was shown at trial, their son did not have.
The trial in the Lethbridge Court House was accompanied by a vicious trial-by-media operation led most prominent by the by the CBC. The prosecutors and the media had clearly collaborated in uniformly painting the Stephan couple as neglectful parents who abused their children by denying them the necessities of life.
In this scenario, failing to give vaccines mandated by the government was to be condemned as the equivalent of child abuse. Vaccines were to be included in the government’s definition of the necessities of life.
The first trial was so tainted in how it was conducted on the government side, that the Supreme Court of Canada ordered a retrial. The second trial resulted in the acquittal of the Stephans. Seeking to reverse the acquittal, the AHS and Crown prosecutors employed by the Alberta Justice Ministry took the case to the Alberta Court of Appeal. Its ruling called for a third trial.
In this third trial all the ducks were set up in a row to lead to the desired judgment in order to create the intended case law. This plan then fell through, however, when Bamidele Adeagbo, who served as an important Crown witness, was found to lack the medical credentials he claimed to have had. It was Adeagbo who conducted the autopsy that was forged to indicate the Stephan child had died of meningitis.
The Crown prosectors had not done due diligence in their zeal to make case law that would have had major implications throughout Canada during the WHO-declared pandemic
The new documentary film on the Stephan case is published below. When I first saw the film several months ago it filled in many gaps in my understanding of how the Alberta Ministry of Justice and the AHS work together to serve interests that run counter to those of the people of Alberta.
The dubious role of the Crown prosecutors in the Stephan case help explain a similar role of the same agency in the aggressive effort to criminalize people involved in the Coutts protest.
The collusion between the Alberta Ministry of Justice and the AHS points to a major issue raised by Dr. Makis. He looks beyond the Ministry of Justice-AHS connection to observe how the vast supply of public funds to Alberta Health Services has had the effect of corrupting the province’s legal establishment including the judiciary. This is a malady that plagues Alberta and must be faced and rectified by the provincial government.
Hence it could be said that the contamination of the people by tainted injections provided by the AHS, extends to the contamination of legal establishment in Alberta. We the people of Alberta depend on ethical lawyer and judges to help keep our society stable and virtuous. Having ready access to honest lawyers and judges is the precondition for fair treatment springing from the equitable application of the rule of law.
An Alberta Bill of Rights Is Not a Viable Answer to the Dilemmas Before Us
It seems Premier Smith’s all-purpose remedy for many of the problems we face in Alberta is to elaborate an Alberta Bill of Rights. This approach fails to address one of the main lessons we should have learned from our experiences throughout the WHO-declared pandemic.
In the course of the worldwide manufactured COVID crisis most formal declarations of freedom and rights were bypassed and ignored by the very governments that wrote them and are meant to enforce them.
This same pattern prevailed in all the countries that made more-or-less the same set of bad decisions that uniformly ran contrary to scientific principles. By uniformly neglecting to enforce the codified protections of human rights and liberties, governments throughout the world essential joined together to throw the already-tattered rule of law into the garbage heap.
In Canada, it was the Charter of Rights and Freedoms was demonstrated to be pretty much a con job created and interpreted by the Trudeaus, father and son. As noted, Canada was far from alone in discovering that our constitutional protections are tenuous and conditional. We learned government codifications of our rights and freedoms are only applicable until we need the protections the most.
When governments decided to force jab many of us and to create medical apartheid as the basis for access to public and private spaces, jobs, education and travel, we learned that all the flowery language in documents like the Charter count for nothing. We saw how Constitutions and covenants and treaties and all manner of rights on paper can be suddenly swept aside as if they never existed.
We saw that this disappearance of our rights and freedoms usually gets done with the willing compliance of the judiciary. Most members of the judiciary have been exposed as ultra-politicized agents assigned to protect the most powerful interests in society and in our governments.
In Canada the main escape clause for governments wanting to impose restrictions on both our inherent and codified rights makes these same rights “subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.” This phrase also appears in the constitutions of New Zealand and South Africa.
Very recently this escape clause was borrowed from Section 1 of the Canadian Charter and inserted into the Alberta Bill of Rights. This modification is not a good sign. This “subject to” clause was tellingly deployed to cut Canadians off from the supposed protections of the Charter during the WHO-declared pandemic.
From the era of Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau to the era of his son, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, we can that see the codification of human rights menaces the protection and assertion of those same human rights.By writing down human rights, this process seems to imply that rights not so codified are not genuine rights worthy of being enforced.
Moreover, the process creates the conditions for governments to see themselves as the source of their citizens’ rights. Because governments imagine they can give rights to their citizens, it follows that they can abolish them when they opt to do so.
The understanding is undermined that human rights are inherent and rooted in the existential mystery of human life. Rights can be respected or blocked by governments but human rights cannot simply be cancelled with legitimacy. Another unfortunate way of looking at the matter is that our human rights are state-given rather than God-given.
In my view it would seem that Premier Smith has a tin ear when it comes to her decision to make an Alberta Bill of Rights the shield behind which our inherent rights are to be protected. At this juncture in history, how could thinking and conscientious people embrace the concept of entrusting governments to make long lists of our rights?
Smith’s plan involves handing over the job of protecting these rights to judges, as if they are reliable fountains of objectivity and integrity not susceptible to corruption and conflicts of interest. This illusion is not born out be our contemporary experiences especially in the course of the last four years. Who would willingly and happily go along with such a plan these days?
The Long View on the Future of Alberta With or Without the Leadership of Premier Danielle Smith
Nadine Wellwood was another speaker who joined Dave Parker and Marco Van Huigenbos in the final panel at the Oct. 28 event. Wellwood is a co-founder of the 1905 Committee. This Committee was a co-sponsor, along with TBA, of The Arriving at Accountability gathering. Among Ms. Wellwood’s main issues are holding Premier Smith true to her promises on tax cuts and government spending.
Wellwood does not like at all the Premier’s plan to raise the population of Alberta to 10 million people by 2050 at a rate of 200,000 added residents per year.
The co-founder of the 1905 Committee points to Premier Smith’s prior criticism of “single source contracting” without any provision for competitive bidding. Wellwood pointed to an instance where Premier Smith violated her own policy by granting a government contract to a former campaign manager.
Another panel member was Peter Weichler. On Oct. 28 he was an active member of the UCP Board representing the Calgary area. Weichler talked about what he sees as the free spending ways of the Danielle Smith government. He spoke of his confusion about what the UCP actually stands for under Premier Smith’s leadership.
Weichler’s term as UCP Board member ended with the AGM of Nov. 1-2. In spite of leaving the UCP Board will Weichler double down in his involvement in the United Conservative Party? Will he help develop the long view of Alberta’s future, with or without the leadership of Premier Danielle Smith?
Great essay Professor Hall. I have been following Danielle Smith and Dr. Makis for the past few years. I live in another province, but Ms. Smith gave us a lot of hope to the point we even thought of moving. What a betrayal to Albertans'. Dr. Makis is a Canadian hero in so many ways. His exposing the convicted doctors who sexually exploited and assaulted children that the college did not document on their record was shocking. Write an exemption note for an experimental vaccine and your licence is gone, but child abuse is okay? The gross misuse of taxpayer money by health authorities is nothing new, but I never realized the scope of the fraud. No wonder there is no money to take care of citizens in a timely and proper manner. I learned a lot about the history of Alberta politics from your article. Thank you.
Thank You, Professor Hall. We are at a point where the spit of rock just fell from under the feet of Wile-E-Coyote, and he's puzzled, about to look down...
That being said, it appears that Erdogan is claiming Syria for Turkey, telling Israel to get back out, and warning the Americans that their Kurdish proxies are a strategic target for Turkey (not to mention the best farmland and oil-wells which they sit on).
Start at 9:40 and watch for 4 minutes for today's update from Military Summary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2wocyrPoFE