62 Comments
User's avatar
ann watson's avatar

its a good discussion - you two sort of are opposites. I think Trump is doing two things. He's softening up his base by doing radical things so that now that the initial days of his new term are over he can do what he needs to do to appease his masters. Blow up the Middle East and keep funding and sending weapons to Ukraine. He's a warpig. And about the word Goy. Its satanic - its an anti-Christian concept. I'm not a goy. I don't get myself rich off filthy zios. Goys do.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Revusky's avatar

"I think Trump is doing two things."

Why do you think it is Trump _doing_ anything? Granted, they want to portray Trump as a an out-of-control "loose cannon" doing all these things, but it that really true? Maybe it's the Deep State (or some faction thereof) that is "doing" these things and Trump is just the front man.

"And about the word Goy. Its satanic..."

Oh, c'mon. That's nonsense. There is nothing "satanic" about the word "goy". At worst, it's just in somewhat dubious taste. Even so, I am satisfied that the use of the word is warranted. You can see that in the visceral reaction it provokes. After all, the purpose is to provoke -- to provoke some thinking anyway.

Expand full comment
The Long Game's avatar

Eh, all Abrahamic religions are philosophically Satanist. Arguably theistically too, without the followers really knowing it. Jesus and Lucifer both are called the morning star in the bible.

We can look up the etymology of goy and hope that what we read is correct. But it's likely doctored and we can just focus on the main point:

The Christians are realizing that Jews that see them as their slaves, and they are getting pissed. Especially those right-wing boy ones.

Did those idiot Hassids and co really not see this coming? We thought they were so great with prophecy? Well prophesize this.

Expand full comment
BASHEER AHMAD EVA BRAUN's avatar

I would never have allowed COWARDS like "The Long Game" to write SATANIST bull shit here!!!

Expand full comment
Jonathan Revusky's avatar

I look at this comment I'm replying to and suddenly wondering: was this text actually written by a human or by an AI chatbot? What human would write this:

"We can look up the etymology of goy and hope that what we read is correct. But it's likely doctored and we can just focus on the main point:"

Yeah, we can look up the etymology of the word "goy", like any other word. Here is a reasonable starting point:

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/goy

You really think that the information on that page is somehow "doctored"? Who would think that? To what purpose? It's just a word, after all. But what I see is this totally incoherent babbling... "the etymology of the word 'goy' is likely doctored, all Abrahamic religions are actually Satanist... blah blah. If anybody tries to engage in any of this, assuming there is actually a thinking human behind it, it is just a waste of time. That is the purpose of this, just to waste people's time. So I suspect that the text is actually AI-generated, but I can't be sure either.

Expand full comment
The Long Game's avatar

Projecting your own bottiness onto your betters will not be effective here, sorry. A bot would have capitalized Morning Star anyway probably. You obviously don't work in tech or have much experience with "AI" chat.

Almost everything on every first page of hits you get online is doctored. If you think otherwise, you are naive.

"Wah wah I don't want to talk about THIS!11" is not a rebuttal.

Abrahamic religions are all ideologically satanist, in that they are the *adversary* (which is what "satan" means). Adversary of what? Of goodness, the default which has allowed our species to survive this long. You think that someone who hears a voice telling him to murder his child ..and then assumes it must be the voice of god and he had better do it ..is anything other than ideologically satanist? Then you are also ideologically satanist in a fundamental way without realizing it.

Since you were too oFfenDeD and defensive to ask me politely how we figure, we were gracious and explained it to you, free of charge. You're welcome.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Revusky's avatar

It's hard to be sure about anything, but I just don't get the feeling that this comment by "The Long Game" or the preceding one, that this is text written by a human being.

Expand full comment
The Long Game's avatar

Ok, let's pretend I'm a bot and that you aren't getting paid by the reply.

You'd still need to make a rebuttal of the points stated. To wit:

Almost everything on every first page of hits you get online is doctored. If you think otherwise, you are naive.

"Wah wah I don't want to talk about THIS!11" is not a rebuttal.

Abrahamic religions are all ideologically satanist, in that they are the *adversary* (which is what "satan" means). Adversary of what? Of goodness, the default which has allowed our species to survive this long. You think that someone who hears a voice telling him to murder his child ..and then assumes it must be the voice of god and he had better do it ..is anything other than ideologically satanist? Then you are also ideologically satanist in a fundamental way without realizing it.

Since you were too oFfenDeD and defensive to ask me politely how we figure, we were gracious and explained it to you, free of charge. You're welcome.

Expand full comment
BASHEER AHMAD EVA BRAUN's avatar

Jonathan Revusky TO Amanda's Musings and ann watson

20 Mar 2025

"Hey, what's the weather like in Tel Aviv?"

The very first time I ever read about Tel-Aviv was in the 1960s when I read some Palestinian pamphlets (I must still have them in my home library!) describing how the illegal Zionist-British Occupiers and Genocidal racist gangsters of the Arab-speaking mainly Muslim land took over that land after they had dismantled the decadent Ottoman Empire and started to build another Brothel for their invading gangs. I saw photographs of WHITE EUROPEAN women prostitutes selling themselves in the Streets of Tel-Aviv.

I would witness first-hand the same "Jewish-Christian" open-air brothels in Paris in the 1970s and 1980s. The Talmudists and Zionists would run all the drug, gambling, fur, crystal, diamond, salmon, ready-to-wear, stationary, and other monopolies in Paris, including the PLO office in the Champs Élysées where Vanessa Redgrave, a world famous actress, took one of my guests (Mr. El Loumi) to. I still remember, some 50 years later, when the Jehovah Death League (Jewish or whatever) , led by Racist Satanyahu Rabbi Meir Kahane and his mafia were burning effigies of Vanessa because of her support of Palestine. I already knew then that the USA of Israel (after the assassination of the Kennedys, Malcolm X and others), the United Kingdom of Great Britain under the Crowned Queen Elisabeth II of Israel, the European Union and the Zionist UNO were running decadent Christendom and the world with Bolshevik, Socialist and Communist complicity.

Passing by, I just wanted my old friend Professor Anthony James Hall to know that I have stopped sharing my GENIUS (far better than Albert EinUraniumStein!) with others because of my old age, personal domestic matters, and dwindling health. A more than 25 year old companion of mine (a university graduate in Physics) threw at me on the telephone, a couple of days ago, that I was mentally deranged because I dared object to his repeated lies. Although I did not watch the present video exchange, I read a few comments made by Amanda's Musings and Ann Watson, and it reminded me of the same old squabbling minds of my younger days.

As an addict, I will probably come back, which I have no intention to do, and say something again as the only mind I have kept in my long list of academics is Anthony!

Shalom to all of you, "Jews and Gentiles" alike, but not to Apartheid Supremacist Ezra-Nehemiah Israel!

Basheer Ahmad Eva Braun

Wednesday 2nd April Fool's Day

P.S. My 3rd wife (Islamic Wedding in 1981) was Polish Małgorzata Skrobut (Margaret) from Varshava. She was kicked out of France by the Jewish-Christian Zionist Mafia while pregnant with our baby! I asked my mother-in-law Barbara what happened to our baby, she said she did not know! My poor Margaret!

SYLVIA STOLZ AND THE ARMENIAN CURSE ON ISRAEL, CHRISTOPHERJON BJERKNES.

https://muhammad-ali-ben-marcus.blogspot.com/2011/11/sylvia-stolz-and-armenian-curse-on.html

Expand full comment
Paulo Kirk's avatar

THat's fun stuff, code switching from zionist parasite to jewish parasite. Fun times in these days two decades and a half into the Century of the Jew. Imagine, 16 million rats on planet earth, and so so much plague.

What drivel, man, as Putin gets his late age/stage circumcision. What a hell of a bunch of Minyans we have in U$AmeriKKKa and Klanada.

https://paulokirk.substack.com/p/the-welfare-cunt-tree-men-like-jp

Expand full comment
Jonathan Revusky's avatar

"you would have much better audience participation if you interviewed Dan Dicks"

That is surely a good suggestion. After interviewing Dan Dicks, you should then interview Tammy Twats.

Expand full comment
Anthony James Hall's avatar

When audience members participate, they are not the audience anymore, right? They join in the overall production.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Revusky's avatar

I thought it could be good if you interviewed Dan Dicks and then interviewed Tammy Twats, but then on further thought, it seemed to me that it could be better to have Dicks and Twats on the same show. More stimulating...

Expand full comment
ScottMcFly's avatar

Tony, I love most of what you do. This was not one of them....

I saw this comment below the posted Rumble video.

PlainJaneThatsMyName

16 hours ago

Weird to be drinking water from a jar and see Prof Hall then do the same.

I'm sorry to say, this was a disappointing way to spend an hour. Mr. Revusky drained any energy from what could have been an interesting discussion. He seemed so disinterested (drunk?) and trailed off confused and forgetting where he was going.

I would much prefer Prof Hall deliver an hour long monologue discussing current events - or even just a reading his latest Substack.

Revusky, is lame....sorry to be so blunt.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Revusky's avatar

How about that! One troll quoting another troll! Eventually you can build up a self-referential web of trolling!

I guess I can quote my self now. As I told "Plain Jane", all of these videos come with a money-back guarantee.

Expand full comment
ann watson's avatar

Hi Jon, thanks for the response. Trump is president and has alot of power. He's hired....he's not a dumbass white goy boy. He is their ' goy ' because he follows their orders, but he's not a dumbass. They've got information on him and they've paid him money, but now its his job. And as far as the word goy. I think you and I have a different conception of Satanic. Its pretty obvious you are an atheist. Not sure but I was wondering if you are Tartar - you have Russian name and yet you have oriental features. But to go on - I'm not atheist and every single thing that happens is either for the far off future wish of the hierarchies for humanity - even including Ahriman which is a better name than Satan, and the other being called Lucifer - not as powerful as the first - different hierarchy - both are fallen beings. So everything that happens - even walking on an insect instead of avoiding it - is either good or evil. There's no autonomous ground. The fucking Satanists - that's what they call themselves - that pretend to be jewish - they do satanic rituals and eat babies and stuff - are the ones responsible for that disrespectful word Goy. In never appears in the Old Testament and I don't believe it was even a word until the Talmud took over the Jewish religion. Thankfully there are jews that don't follow that evil book

Expand full comment
Anthony James Hall's avatar

Jonathan's mother is Chinese.

Expand full comment
ann watson's avatar

and his father's Russian ? I hope I'm not being rude asking. Sometime it offends people But he's talking about goys, which is also to do with race, so hopefully he doesn't mind.

Expand full comment
Anthony James Hall's avatar

I'm not sure where his father was born. But Revusky is a Polish name apparently

Expand full comment
ann watson's avatar

ah...thanks for telling me. Was the father teaching in a university in America ? Where he was an fanatical zionist ? Jonathon asked me to stay to the script but this is the script.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Revusky's avatar

You can ask what you want, I suppose, but it would be much better if you actually had some comment about the content of the discussion itself.

Expand full comment
ann watson's avatar

well I listened to the whole thing. And I also made comments on Anthony's Substack post - which is where I found out about it. The beginning of the conversation kept getting pulled back to religion, which I already commented on. The end part - regarding the word Goy - Goy is an anti Christian slur. It never once appears in either the Old Testament or the New Testament and so it comes from that Satanic publication called the Talmud. I know that many whites are not real Christians and its too bad, after all that the whites have done to the other people of the world, that Christianity is blamed for it. But Goy is anti-Christian in the sense of national religions. I've never heard it used for Chinese people or Blacks. Its for the European white nobility probably becasue that's where the Jews got their impressions - the royality that wanted luxury and spent all their inheritance and started borrowing money. They were kind of the example of Goys - although their Christianity was far better than nowadays. But the Jews despised that

Expand full comment
Jonathan Revusky's avatar

"The end part - regarding the word Goy - Goy is an anti Christian slur. It never once appears in either the Old Testament"

Hi Ann. First of all, you're trying to police discourse, as in "You can't use this word... you can't use that word..." So, first of all, I would ask: Did Tony or anybody else appoint you in this role, as a language cop?

Second of all, you apparently don't know anything about the etymology of the word "goy". Actually, the word "goy" appears plenty of times in the old testament, certainly in the original hebrew. In biblical hebrew, "goy" just means nation. The term "goyim" is used to refer to the nations (the other nations) of the world -- Babylon, Persia, what have you...

However, in yiddish, the term "goy", though it originally is from the biblical hebrew took on another meaning. It was used just to mean a non-Jewish person. It may not be that polite, no, but I think it is quite a stretch to call it "satanic". In fact, the way I was using the term, you could say it is short for "goyische Kopf", which is a "goy head", i.e. somebody (non-Jewish) who ain't too bright. Thus, to call a "Christian zionist" -- somone who has "We stand by Israel" outside his house and has seen "Schindler's List" umpteen times and cried each time -- as a "goyische Kopf" or the more long-winded formulation of "dumbass white boy goy" is not very nice, but seems quite appropriate.

But anyway, you apparently did not understand the point. And really, this trying to lecture on the word "goy" being unacceptable, as if somebody appointed you as a language cop... well, really, leave that to the Jews. Policing language is a Jewish specialty after all.

Expand full comment
ann watson's avatar

you wanted me to stay on topic and are now censoring my discourse - not the other way around. And Goy is a derogatory word used against Christians. Even if the origin of the word means Nation. Anyway - I won't say anything about your rudeness. I guess that's how you interact with people. I even have another friend that you've been rude to. It doesn't stimulate more conversation btw. If you want to use the term useless white goy and say its not rude...then you and I grew up in a different culture for sure. Chink means a little piece of something. Its not rude neither. All the Talmud is Satanic and people rape and eat babies too. Guess you don't believe that neither. They don't call the Chinese goy, to my knowledge. Maybe the Chinese don't work for the Jews the same way whites do. They like to use white people. And call them goys if they work for them. Its a well known fact. I actually haven't seen Schindler's List ever. And I don't care if you use the word goy. I'm not a liberal - you read that wrong. I'm just saying what I think _ I couldn't care less what you do in your life. I doubt you use that word. I was just giving my opionion...You twist stuff .

Expand full comment
ann watson's avatar

actually I made comments under the video as well...this is Anthony's substack I think

Expand full comment
Anthony James Hall's avatar

This blog on Substack is indeed my blog but Substack maintains an overall title across the whole platform I imagine. The Steamyard platform where we recorded our discussion belongs to Jonathan.

I am very interested in JR's detailed and candid explanation of what GOY actually means. I'd be interested to see a Hebrew language reference to the root term in a Hebrew scripture in various Hebrew scriptures. What to they call non-Jews on the Talmud I wonder?

To me the most meaty sentence in Jonathans explanation was the following:

"Thus, to call a "Christian zionist" -- someone who has "We stand by Israel" outside his house and has seen "Schindler's List" umpteen times and cried each time -- as a "goyische Kopf" or the more long-winded formulation of "dumbass white boy goy" is not very nice, but seems quite appropriate."

My general impression is that "goy" had something to do with cattle. I notice Jon discourse indicated that GOY took on a specifically anti-Christian twist in Yiddish. I remember a Jewish girl friend of mine back in Toronto told me a similar term. She told me my Jewissche (?) Kopt (head) was not very developed. That would imply there are non-Jews with small and large undertstandings of Jewish things. I was a bit hurt when I got a low score on this test. I'm sure that among Jews they have many words to indicate who is high up the scale or low down in Jewish knowledge.

Jonathan's direction of the insulting nature of the slur specifically at Christian Zionists (Zionist Christians?) I see as pretty deserved. Jesus, son of the Lord, is the Prince of Peace, not some sort of War God as John Hagee and some of his fellow billionaires colleagues have reinvented our Saviour.

Good discussion.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Mar 21
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Mar 21
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Amanda's Musings ...'s avatar

Dear lord, Prof Hall. It was agonizing to sit through that.

No fault on your part, but Mr. Revuski was so disinterested and dull ... I wish I was able to reach through the screen to slap him and tell him to sit up straight. I couldn't watch it all. I assume he ended up sliding off his chair and passed out.

Have me on your show and let me rant about Donald Trump being a real let-down, how the tariffs are a ploy to usher in AI jobs to replace humans, and the Houthis are a blessing to humanity.

I'm still fuming about that turd (Mr. Revuski) not having enough decency to show up sober for a public interview. If my mother was still alive, she give him a swift kick in the ass and teach him proper manners.

Expand full comment
Anthony James Hall's avatar

Well that's great's great you want to be more involved. How about send me an essay with the idea I might publish here if its up to speed. Seriously. It can be of any length and about any topic. If its connected to a topic I've already written about in my two hundred or so essays so far produced on the fly while history unfolding, that would be great but not a requirement.

Here's are links to some essays Jonathan published at Unz Review a few years ago. Are you aware of Unz Review. Its an important part of the backstory of how Jonathan and I met. Maybe something in their content of Jon's writings might make you want to respond in any way you want.

https://www.unz.com/author/jonathan-revusky/

I want to try new things things in publishing on the Internet right now. I didn't get to this point in a day. Frankly I'm tired of seeing goys talking to goys about Jews. ie Kevin Barrett to the brilliant E. Michael joins. They are usually very smart and entertaining. Good for them. But let's move on.

I thought Jonathan asked a good question about ahhhh.... gentiles... the more polite term. Why is it "we" ahhh.... non-Jews have been so helpless in the face of what I recall he referred to as "Zionist Narrative Bullshit." Jon spreads his irreverence around. I thinks is good right now to take a plunge into some raunchy identity politics. Universalism has it place, bit so too does the other side.

Expand full comment
Amanda's Musings ...'s avatar

I read the drunk's Unz article, noticing the not so innocent ad nauseum manipulative word play of the title he chose.

Imagine if he wrote 'The Jewish Rape Army Is Coming to Getcha!', instead?

It would be closer to the truth.

I read the Ron Unz Review, Tony. I was friends with Mark Taliano on my old Facebook account and read his book and Unz articles ... 1o years ago? I can't find him mentioned anywhere in the link you sent. I hope he is ok. Still read Pepe's and Phil Giraldi's stuff. Can't find The Saker, either. In the middle of getting through Dr. Oualaalou's books on Saudi Arabia and Iran, so haven't read Unz in a month. Global Research is another site I love. Prof Michel Chossudovsky still appears in my email, but it's always old articles reposted. Come to think of it, Mark was Global Research, not Unz. I'm an idiot.

I have two of Kevin's books .. well three if counting Laurent Guyénot's. I even have a very thin pamphlet book of EM Jones's .. 'The Jew Taboo', lol. What can I say, I haven't owned a TV since leaving home. I even have two heavy books of yours. Literally heavy. My bookshelf broke and I'm waiting for Ikea to deliver a new one. I liked 'Earth into Property', what I've read so far. (Goal driven at the moment to read two other books in order to leave an honest review. )

You need recognizable names to boost your project. I think Cat McGuire would be good. Ffs, do not bring on Jeremy Rothe-Kushel. I implore you.

Good evening.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Revusky's avatar

"I read the drunk's Unz article, noticing the not so innocent ad nauseum manipulative word play of the title he chose."

I'm sure you're lying. You didn't read any article of mine or any book by Kevin Barrett either.

How do I know?

It's simple. None of this material was ever published in a comic book edition.

Expand full comment
Amanda's Musings ...'s avatar

I have a comic book collection, Jonathan. When I was younger nothing was more annoying than missing an edition from a set. I loved the story arch of Swamp Thing becoming godlike and knowing the thoughts of every living thing on Earth. The art work was stunning. My mom would often buy my brothers and me each a plastic grab bag full of random comics to read and we'd share them. Some really awful ones would be in the mix, and nothing was worse than repeat comics.

The comic section is still my favorite part of the newspaper.

As to reading Kevin's books, I'm not lying. In fact, there's even a chapter Prof Hall wrote in one book. As expected, it's about white men destroying every culture in order to dominate and impose their own. A reply to the Ayatollah Khamenei.

I did read your article - only one. Your offensive title set the mood, perpetuating the social stigma that is not a joke but daily false accusation Muslims face. That lie is the reason Westerners find it so easy to look the other way while Jews continue to kill innocent children. You face no struggles, Jonathan. You belong to the most privileged class of people to exist, which also happens to be the most sadistic. Your 'lighthearted' title shows your inability to 'read the room'.

I'm done with both you and Tony.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Revusky's avatar

Hey, Amanda, I was wondering. What are your pronouns? (Mine are "he" and "him".) I suppose your pronouns are supposed to be "she" and "her" but I never really found it convincing that you were female. And this bit about collecting comic books as a child, isn't that almost entirely a boy thing?

I have noticed that homosexual men, particularly of the receiving variety, often talk in the feminine. My hunch is that that is your case.

"As to reading Kevin's books, I'm not lying."

You're not lying, eh? Well, okay, but that's what all liars say...

"I'm done with both you and Tony."

Good.

Expand full comment
Amanda's Musings ...'s avatar

What an absolute moron you are, Revusky.

I was born with a vagina.

I also hunt and use a crossbow, thanks to growing up with brothers.

I'm not gay, but if you were the last man on Earth, I might switch to tacos.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Revusky's avatar

"I'm still fuming about that turd (Mr. Revuski) not having enough decency to show up sober for a public interview."

On the one hand, it is somewhat disturbing to face this kind of very personal animosity from someone one does not even know. On the other hand, I think I should take it as a sign that I'm doing something right. For your information, I was quite sober during the conversation. It may well be that you would be falling over drunk after a single glass of wine, but that is not my case! LOL.

But anyway, do you actually have any critique of anything I said in the conversation?

Expand full comment
Anthony James Hall's avatar

Good question Jonathan. Let's get some real substance into the discussion. But wow, we have a discussion beginning. Let the games begin... Word games to prevent war games... Amanda and Ann are showing the way.

Expand full comment
Amanda's Musings ...'s avatar

'Word games to prevent war games' or 'war of words'?

Johnny only livened up and slid out of his stupefied act after mentioning the pejorative 'goyim'. (Topic was the extent and degree of Jewish power, and Johnny nipped that in the bud.)

Half dead on his chair, coming to life to push another level of Jewish victimhood: 'it's not our fault, the goyim didn't stop up'.

Earlier mention of the horrific blood bath of dead Palestinians, drunkenly pushed aside with, 'that's another topic'.

It was comical and grotesque.

Expand full comment
Anthony James Hall's avatar

stop up? stop us, right?

Expand full comment
Amanda's Musings ...'s avatar

Right.

Prob should proofread but prefer to send w/o checking, or I'll never send at all.

Expand full comment
Anthony James Hall's avatar

I'm glad you are sending it. In fact if you look above, I welcome your voice and appreciate your spunkiness, or should I get all professorial and say, irreverence.

Expand full comment
Amanda's Musings ...'s avatar

I can assure you, Mr. Revusky, it would take more than one glass of wine to put me in the state you were in. Frankly, I wouldn't even drink if I was starting a pilot project.

Go back and watch yourself. Look at how you sat slumped and would say random words that led nowhere. That is my critique of your conversation.

Expand full comment
Anthony James Hall's avatar

Jon seemed to me he was always upright in his chair. Random words that lead nowhere... maybe I interrupted him. It might have gone both ways in that respect. I was trying to keep it moving along.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Revusky's avatar

Well, thanks. Nothing like a bit of constructive criticism.

Hey, what's the weather like in Tel Aviv?

Expand full comment
Amanda's Musings ...'s avatar

Wouldn't know, Johnny. Hard to see from all the dust in the air due to the ballistic missile fired from Yemen. Bloody sirens going off everywhere makes it hard for a girl to think straight.

Expand full comment