21 Comments
author

Hi Robert Snefjella. I've published a number of essays at Unz Review.

https://www.unz.com/author/anthony-hall/

I felt Ron Unz began to gaslight me after he published my first coronavirus essay in March of 2020

https://www.unz.com/article/who-or-what-started-the-wuhan-coronavirus-epidemic/

Ron took exception to what I wrote of the Chinese bioweapon program. Soon Ron was including me in the his "anti-vaxx crackpottery" category. I found it very difficult to believe the same person who could write that good burst of American Pravda essays in 2018 was the same person that slammed the door on the interpretation of the injections as bioweapons disguised as a medical cure. Especially after the Canadian Truckers, I was energized to write many things on related topics. These essays appeared in Global Research.ca

https://www.globalresearch.ca/author/anthony-j-hall

Now I'm also trying to get up and running, "Looking out at the World from Canada."

Expand full comment

Oppenheimer & his co-religionists wanted to drop the nuclear devices on Germany. And turn the country into radioactive glass. When the war ended before the terror weapons were fully operational, they saw no need to use them on Japan.

Expand full comment

Voltaire is credited with observing that if you want to know who is in power find out who can't be criticized. Perhaps a corollary might be: tyrannical or illegitimate or criminal or pathological power is characterized by its reflexive harsh suppression of, and resort to severe punishment of, critical free speech. Truth unleashed remains a lethal nemesis to all criminal power.

One loosely affiliated 'tribe' of transnational humans, whose membership includes those who have achieved the conjunction of near global financial hegemony with near global mass media hegemony, while containing within its ranks a powerful subset that practises a de facto sociopathic belief system, one which defines 'the other' as fair game for all depravity, has inserted its power and its influence into just about every institutional nook and cranny of the 'west'. This is a core problem. And while it seems to me that general public awareness of this catastrophic situation has grown greatly over the last few years - an essential improvement - I think the chances are, unfortunately, that the impetus of the evil, the destructive tendency already unleashed, will afflict humanity to some catastrophic extent.

A troubling aspect of our situation has been revealed through the Covid atrocity: people of strength of character, always essential to healthy society, seem in critically short supply in executive positions, and among their minions. In the 'west', people of good character appear to be quite numerous still among independent 'working people', say truckers.

So as far as I can make out, increased societal sanity would seem to be in the direction of more empowered little people, and less empowered powerful people.

Expand full comment
author

In your explanation you are very diplomatic and thoughtful, Robert Snefjella. What a treat. Do you think a genuine discussion might break out in this space? Thanks for contributing a very promising start.

Expand full comment

In recent years important work on the issues raised by your article has been done by Ron Unz at the Unz review. Indeed it could be said more generally that Ron Unz has made a kind of middle aged new career of confessing how 'mainstream media' had led him seriously astray on many important issues and then describing his account of his various journeys towards a more realistic understanding of recent history.

This important body of work by Unz, who is of Jewish origins, includes devastating critiques of aspects of twentieth century Judaism, including its exploitation and enforcement of falsehood-riddled but 'official' versions of the 'Holocaust' narrative.

Strange, but in light of Unz's great contributions to and defence of free speech and freedom of thought quite forgivable in my view, has been Unz's descent into absurdity with naive-seeming reliance on official narratives regarding aspects of the Covid crime scene.

It is a very great tragedy that endemic falsehood and keeping the public in the dark about so many important matters has been so successful. The layman's definition of insanity is 'being out of touch with reality'. Society has thus in effect been driven crazy by lies. This has already led to horrors beyond counting. And the incredibly wonderful potential that is inherent in the human has been brought by the hegemony of lies to the very edge of possible oblivion.

Expand full comment

Thank you Snejella, I like that : "hegemony of lies". Absolutely true.

Expand full comment
author

So Great to see your digital presence here, Eleni, especially here.

Expand full comment

As a former subscriber I just can't reconcile the belief given here

that all land comprising Canada belongs to the aboriginals and thus I have worked land that does not belong to me all these many years. I am talking about titled land here.

This talk of genocide in Residential schools is no different than the myth of the holocaust and is now enshrined as National reconciliation day. Personally i have nothing to reconciliate here as a matter of fact I'm feeling awfully anti conciliatory these days.This is all a devilish work in progress and there is more to come. What we are witnessing here as Canadians is the creation of at least a two tier society. One of special status Canadians if need be, or non Canadians if need be. A group to whom all other Canadians are by law required to support and acquiesce to whenever this class demands it.

I'm starting to think that Stalin had a point.. NO MAN NO PROBLEM. Seems to me the Aboriginals got a pretty good deal considering what happened to many other peoples and tribes throughout history.

The bottom line ... you do not own the land known as Canada. Make do with what you have like everyone else.

WBJ

Expand full comment
author

Addressing "The" Holocaust in an Era of Heightened Danger of Nuclear Holocaust

Here's the topic. Can we please continue the comments section by addressing this subject.

Expand full comment

Sorry to have diverged above, Professor Hall, but I was tempted...

You opened with questions which brought me to describe what "my" narrative of "the holocaust" is. I know Bobby Kennedy Jr. is going through this now, and I'd like to get back to that.

When my wife and I fulfilled our dream of traveling around the world with our 4 teenagers, on bikes and with backpacks, for 9 monts, we visited the Anne Frank House in Amsterdam, Dachau concentration camp in Bavaria, and Tuol Sleng museum in Cambodia ("killing fields"). The lesson was the same in all 3, not "monsters", but that ordinary people do this to other ordinary people when history takes this kind of a turn. The perpetrators may then become victims in round-2.I taught the kids that they had to be on lookout for this happening and to get away quickly before it was too late.

"How will we know?" I could not answer that, except to say to keep watching for it.

I saw it in the summer of 2021 when "the unvaccinated" were designated as lesser-humans, dirty, antisocial, inconsiderate, willing to spread deadly contagion to their innocent grandmothers... They were to be excluded from society, shunned and fired. Many advocated imprisonment.

This happened to Jews in Germany, and to Slavs and Gypsies, and mentally retarded Germans, and to Slavs in general, especially Russian, and it happened to the French "Cathar" Christians who did not recognize the authority of Pope Innocent III,and it happened to anybody in the Bolshevik revolution, even Bolsheviks, and in Mao's Cultural Revolution, and under Pol Pot, and so on. It's a human archetypal patter. Nobody "owns" it, but everybody comes wired for it, and should know that

I knew, and said openly that "I had to stand naked with the Jews". This was poorly recieved by some of my coworkers and the administrators, not only those who were Jewish. I was culturally-mis-appropriating somebody else's heritage and causing deep offense. I was sincere, and I accepted firing on the principle that history called for me to stand immeddiately in that line of "untermenschen". Anything else, such as applying for a religous/conscience-exemption, which would have been granted, would be a half-spirited commitment, a commentment of only speech, not of my full life.

That was a cusp in my life. It approaches 2 years of unemployment, but I have been busy following my conscience. I am ok, and my needs are met. I am on a different path than I would have been if I had applied for exemption, without openly stating the immorality of requiring experimental medical injections, and of creating a class of humans without basic human rights. Perhaps the world is on a different path. What would my less-committed path have been?

Bobby Kennedy Jr. is perfectly reasonable on every topic except the topic of occupied Palestine.

This is not just painfully apparent and politely demured to.

Now this is brought to the fore in discussions, because it is an open-sore. It is incongruent. It is being talked about.

Oops; it's being talked about...

My own observation is that Bobby is only uncomfortable when he is talking about this. He becomes more tense and strident, and his body language changes. This has been his stance as long as he had a stance, probably since he was a teenager.

When he says he "protects himself", what does that mean? He gets an enigmatic look.

Who killed his dad, his uncle(s), his cousin JFK Jr? It's hard to be sure, but even Joe Kennedy Jr. died-funny in an airplane. JFK Jr. was entering into politics with a muck-raking anti-Clinton series for "George" magazine when he died in 1999 in that plane crash.

Bobby Jr. has visited Sirhan Sirhan, the young, hypnotized Palestinian patsy, who was supposed to have killed RFK in 1968 for "being pro-Israel". He says he knows Sirhndid not kill his dad, that a bodyguard hired for that night, did it. The "killed for being pro-israel" touch really turns the kniife in the wound, does it not?

I suspect Bobby Jr. signed ablood-oath-truce with the Mossad/ADL long ago, to never deviate from his past and current position. I have no proof. I only suppose.

Sesame-Street-Rule applies to him... "One of these things is not like the others."

Still, he may be walking the true-path. Everything else I have seen about his reformed life and spiritual motivation speaks to that. This is paradoxical, but it may keep working to raise the topic of the western colonialist genocide of native Palestinian people.

Bobby can keep being reasonable about everything except "Israel". It looks like he will. It looks like it breaks this topic open, as it breaks open poisoned-vaccines, corporate-control of government ("fascism"), climate engineering, etc.

I guess we will see. "He protesteth too much" for "Israel".

Expand full comment
author

Hello Dr. Day. Here's a link to an essay that makes repeated reference to Robert. F. Kennedy Jr. as some kind of longstanding Mossad asset. The author, Medical Doctor A. Bart Classen, supports his claims to having inside information based on his period working in close proximity to Fauci's NIAID/NIH. He asserts that Mossad was intent on infiltrating the NIAID. Their interest, Dr. Classen said, was initially in knowing how to kill people in ways that look like natural deaths. Here's an extract of the abstract,

"The author witnessed first hand infiltration of NIAID/NIH by Israel’s Mossad. While working at NIAID/NIH one or more coworkers expressed a need to “preempt the next Jewish Holocaust”. For thirty years since leaving NIH the Author has paid close attention to Mossad’s involvement in illegal US bioweapon activity

and attempts to disclose his observations. The Author hopes to educate the public on the current bioweapon attack with COVID-19 and vaccines. The Author believes that Mossad intends to kill billions of people."

https://rense.com/general97/covid19-and-illegal-us-bioweapons-activity-an-insiders-revelations-2432.pdf

I don't endorse this interpretation but I don't dismiss its contents out of hand either.

One of Kennedy's connections to Mossad was apparently through Jeffrey Epstein. Donald Trump also turns up in this interesting narrative.

I defer to E. Michael Jones in explaining in the video and elsewhere how the presidential candidate's campaign inevitably collides with the Holocaust narrative.

What events in history might qualify as a Holocaust? From time to time I bring forward the subject of the treatment of the Indigenous peoples in the Western Hemisphere since 1492.

Expand full comment

I have looked at that link and read the abstract.

Yes there was genocide in the Americas by "Guns, Germs and Steel", as per theJared Diamond book. Germs killed the most, 80 -90%. Measles and Smallpox were primary.

Kennedy and Trump both had brief associations with Epstein. RFK Jr. and his family once flew on Epstein's plane.

Epstein sought to connect with the rich and powerful and to ingratiate himself. It was his job.. He did not apparently "get to first base" with either candidate.

"Mossad asset" is a relative and loosely applied term, is it not?

If RFK Jr. has been warned,and agreed to stay within "red lines" to keep living, what degree of "capture" is that?

I am reminded of the story "The Bound Man" http://glenncolerussell.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-bound-man-by-ilse-aichinger.html

I watch Kennedy and listen closely. It is "one of these things is not like the others" ,when he speaks of "Israel"/Palestine.

I seek Divine guidance , myself, and he says that he does. Much of what he says and what I can observe speaks to this as being true. I sense that it is. How does anything ever change in history? There is more than one way, but it almost always involves critical leaders in critical times. Many countries have such a leader/ruler, who is effective, though we might find any of them distasteful, and most will have ordered peole killed in some way.

How can one rank in terms of evil: Stalin, Hitler, FDR, Mussolini, Churchill, Franco and Tojo? How about Mao? (Sun YatSen's early death from cancer was a great tragedy for China and the world. Mao and Chiang were lesser Lieutenants.)

I alwys look for signs that any potential leader is actually spiritually attuned and attentive. I do see this in RFK Jr. He has come back spiritually from drug addiction and lascivious sex, infidelity. He came back and stayed better, as far as i can tell.

Who is the best and most spiritual national leader on the world stage now?

I have my views, but I will leave the question open. (Not Fidel's son, though.)

Expand full comment
author

Bobby Kennedy is indeed an inspiration whose enlightened research and conclusions on a giant array of topics is nothing short of spectacular. What chance would he have of becoming president if he didn't go along with lobby that right now has virtual veto power over those that aspire to achieve high office. The existence of this veto power and how it has come to exist, is a crucial topic of our time. The topic needs some honest discussion beyond the thumbs-up versus thumbs-down dumbed-down kind of degraded discourse imposed on us by the likes of the "Ambassador" Deborah Lipstadt, author of Denying the Holocaust. The process of studying and writing about history on any subject is all about revisionism. Revisionism is essential to the process of getting closer and closer to the truth. To declare this process on ONE flagged topic, to be prohibited, illegal, censored and subject to punishment through incarceration, is anti-intellectual and brutish. To accept such limitations is to give consent to our enslavement.

Expand full comment

"Revisionism is essential to the process of getting closer and closer to the truth. To declare this process on ONE flagged topic, to be prohibited, illegal, censored and subject to punishment through incarceration, is anti-intellectual and brutish. To accept such limitations is to give consent to our enslavement."

Hence the "Bound Man"analogy.

Expand full comment

I may join you a bit in this off-topic-zone, Way Back Joe, mostly because when I saw the face of King Charles on those Canadian bank notes I was reminded that I just read that he owns 1/6 of the solid surface of our planet and 90% of Canada.

Creating disputes between lower classes helps maintain the power of upper-class "owners".

Don't fall for it.

Native-Americans, "first peoples" were subjected to extensive genocide in North America, more in the US than Canada, but the boarding schools were employed in both countries to break up families and traditions, and to destroy the languages that carried them on. The cildren were treated horribly. This is historical fact.

Who did this? It was not the owners, but those who worked for the owners.

Who is blamed?

Who has "ownership"?

How is ownership enforced? Monopoly on violence, right?

I worked as a physician on the Navajo reservation for 2 years when I finished residency-training.

A lot had gone on, and it still echoes in the lives of people.

I knew a man well who had gone to boarding school. He explained it to me. It was always forced. Punishment was harsh and quick for speaking anything but English. There was a uniform, and uniform conduct, and approved topics.

Expand full comment

John Day MD

So let the son the grandson and the sons of the grandsons pay for wrongs they did not do. This idea is what is disturbing when you see people actually wanting this to become reality. Blood guilt, are we serious. Well thats definitely what is going to happen in Canada as it has elsewhere. Its a criminal enterprise because it has no foundation in justice or law. This entire process of fingering a large part of the population for blood libel because of past events involving people no longer alive should not even see the light of day.

I was born in Germany just a few years before the real war got started. The house I was born in got bombed to smithereens by the Allies. My Aunts who stayed in what became east Germany all got raped for months by Russian Mongol Troops. My Grandpa as I later learned was beaten to death and hung on a hook in his shed for trying to stop the raping. I and my parents and siblings wound up in Canada as immigrants, or as we were actually called DPs displaced persons. No german that I know of ever received compensation for plunder, raping, unjustified killing, illegal and immoral bombing of cities and towns. Ohh jeez I forgot we all did the Holocaust so we deserved what we got and are still getting, likely forever... Blood Libel. I admire the Japanese of that time living in Canada and the US, deprived of their property ( they never got it back in BC ) and also their freedom during the war and interred into labour camps. All this while being sworn in citizens of both countries. Those Japanese never asked for compensation, life goes on for everyone, it has to. At best these things become historical footnotes, nothing more.

I'm done with this GD insanity

WBJ

Expand full comment
author

Hello WBJ. The extent of the murder, rape, and pillage of Germans after World War II is appalling. The double standards in all these intertwined cycles of genocide and ruthlessness is stupendous. The Schaefer siblings have much to say about the treatment of Germans before, during, and after WWII. Their father almost died in one of the starvation camps Eisenhower set up for German prisoners of war. Are you aware of Kaufman's "Germany Must Perish" published in 1941. Kaufman proposed sterilizing all Germans so that they would cease to exist for all time. The book was a NYT best seller. The general subject of the treatment of Germany comes up a lot in my discussion with Alfred Schaefer who has done, and will do again, significant jail time for talking about the history of Jews and Germans in ways that are outlawed. Check out the relevant video above if you get a chance.

Expand full comment

AJH

The murder and rape and pillage of many Germans is just a minor walk down a small memory hole. It rates as a "did you know" this or that oddity. I brought it up as an example of what people can endure at the hands of other people when hostility rages in the mind, and to point out that people can suffer and just move on with their lives without being consumed by revenge.

I am well schooled in German and European history even though I am a grade 9 dropout having gone to work to help to support my family.

I am also aware of why Germany had to be destroyed. The true power block controlling the masses could not tolerate a Germany un -compliant to the means applied to make it a subservient serf to the international Banksta Cartel. Hitlers arrival on the scene sealed her fate as far as the internationalist Banksta cabal was concerned. They tried to control Hitler but failed.

So they destroyed Germany, and with that created a kaleidoscope of unreal nonsense

making caricatures out of all things vital to a flourishing civilization.

Europeans tired of war bought into the new unified Europe of No Wars and prosperity for all. Giving up their sovereign existence as Nations and being directed in policy and just about everythig else by unelected ( gods ) bureaucrats in Brussels.

However things are going to come apart possibly soon, the system of debt and war misery for banksta cover is over.

It's been a great game of usury against all nations and thus their citizens of debt forever for us and unfathomable wealth for the Bankstas. Those in the know are the very few, I count myself in as one of the knowers.

The public is more ignorant than ever, not a clue. Well... after all it is said that ignorance is bliss so carry on.

Canadians are being played perfectly by the Trifecta of Government, Corporations ( do I have to name them ) and the international Banksta Cartel.

Enjoy the new holiday "The National Reconciliation Day" brought to you by the Trifecta too.

WBJ

Expand full comment

"Done with insanity" .. good.

The machinations behind the world wars were banking/financial machinations, right?

Stacking injustice and torture does not work, but what about King Charles "owning" 90% of Canada? Pawns are not the actual enemies of pawns, right?

There are non-violent ways to seek a more just accounting.

Expand full comment

Well go ahead and enlighten me... Bonnie Prince Charles now the King of er, er, er England owns 90% of Canada. Well now.. how can that be when we already know that the injuns own all of Canada. Is this some kind of Bank of Canada trick regarding our scrip ( printed cash ) or some hidden secret that in reality isn't worth a free carpet ride from here to Mooosineee.

WBJ

Expand full comment

Ijust saw another article about who the biggest titular owners are on our fair planet,and it was as before, the British Royal family, "King Charles" are #1, owning 1/6 of the planetary land face and 90% of Canadian surface. It's that same thing that crops up every few years. I deletedthe article after reading.It's mundane.

Wikipedia says this ("89% of Canada is "Crown Lands"): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_ownership_in_Canada#:~:text=The%20majority%20of%20all%20lands,remaining%2011%25%20is%20privately%20owned.

Expand full comment