According to GOP Congressman ( Florida ) Brian Mast
Dead Palestinian babies aren't all that innocent.
He believes that Palestinian babies are not innocent civilians but "terrorists" who should be killed.
Mast made the horrifying comment when confronted by Code Pink protesters outside his office on Wednesday.
In a video Mast can be seen calmly telling the demonstrators. "It would be better if you kill all the terrorists and kill everyone who are supporters.
When asked if he has seen the babies killed in Israeli attacks, Mast says, " These are not innocent Palestinian civilians.
The babies ? " the activist asks in astonishment.
Mast then says that the "half a million people starving to death" should have elected a pro Israel government.
Hmmm... isn't that what was said about the 3million civilians bombed to death in Germany.
When one protester points out that much of Gaza's infrastructure has been destroyed, Mast says," And there's more that needs to be destroyed. Did you hear me? There's more that needs to be destroyed, he said again for emphasis.
Why do I bring this to the table. To point out that this is the thinking, belief and nature of many Israeli Jews, and above all that total lack of empathy to the suffering of others, let anything happen to Jewish sensibilities however and listen to the cries of anguish. It is a nature alien to most gentiles and it is important to make note of that distinction. It therefore is impossible and silly for a gentile to attempt to affect the thinking or behaviour of a hateful Jew by conversation, no matter how logical that might be. The true masters of all humanity have counted on this for centuries as they turned everything upside down and confounded the minds and souls of all gentiles.
Almost every great thinker throughout recorded time has lived by a code of self restraint, of truth to self and others as a foundation for living a life worth living in any so called civilization which by its nature is fraught with faults. A life worth living is only possible where the stage is set for it to flourish. That stage is one of rules and laws which go beyond the norms of civility and actively protect said life worth living.
So do we go on.. every man for himself a sure fire road to zero. Or do we unite.. small at first ( the core of formulation and principle ) then larger groups until we can no longer be ignored, until due to our strength and principles we no longer ask we simply take, because that is our right as a people. As in take away the corrupt power bloc that has ruled the country for decades.
“Then on January 26 the ICJ came out with a historic ruling that acknowledged that a plausible instance of genocide was occurring in Gaza. The court did not order a cease fire. According to Michel Chossudovsky, the Court opted rather to call on the Netanyahu government to prevent and punish itself for possibly committing genocide.”
The ICJ called for the end of the killings and of all action which may result in harm for the Palestinian people.
In other words, it did called for a cease fire.
They did not use the term ceasefire, but in their written decision, using the technical terminology related to their convention, they did.
“Ceasefire” is is just the word used for the madia spin.
Advise you read this article which explains in details from a legal point of view what the ICJ decision say.
Here's is my comment which came up on some of these issues I discussed via radio. It came up when I was a guest with Dr. Kevin Barrett on his Substack, Kevin's Newsletter
"That's too flippant and misleading Kevin. When we discussed the genocide party animals on your show, and I didn't go along with your easy peesy narrative. You wanted to correct me, not converse with me in a constructive fashion about the news that I was looking into concerning Prof. Chossudovsky's critique of the ICJ ruling.
I specifically explained that I had at that point read Chossudovsky but had not yet read to source documents. So I indicated I would hold back from going deeper in an analysis until I had done more homework. That's different than folding because I didn't have a good answer to your question." What was your.... oh so good question... for which I apparently didn't have a good answer? Rather than engaging in debate and then declaring yourself to be the winner, back up a bit. At least tell me the content of the good question I couldn't, or chose not to answer. After all I'm a volunteer doing a public service, not an applicant for a job or a student doing a test.
Hi John Scrivener. Welcome to the discussion. OK. Now I know how you read my psychology. It looks like a reasonable possibility. This whole subject about what to do about a genocide right in our face every day, can have a depressive effect. But now that you have come up with your diagnosis of my mental state, what about contributing to the substance of issue at hand. Any thoughts outside the ad hominem realm on the substance of the ICJ ruling and on various responses to it?
Prof. Chossudovsky is incredibly productive, far reaching, and deep digging in his activist scholarship. He deserves some respect and consideration Kevin. To me he is an exemplary illustration of a senior academic keeping up with the news as a tenacious activist scholar. How many like him are around? Maybe my bias as a Canadian is a factor here.
My first encounter with Michel was when he accepted my essay after our Edmonton presentation in 2008. "The Lies and Crimes of 9/11" is still published on my archive at GR.ca. You may not be aware John that I gave my first 9/11 paper at the Stanley E Milner Library in Edmonton, sharing the podium with Kevin. Kevin was then riding the wave of his fame as the Fox New's favourite evil Muslim... and a traitor to boot.
Its too early to shut down open debate on the ICJ ruling. It seems, however, everything that needs to be decided on the World Court's role has already been decided here on Kevin's newsletter. Or if there is to be a discussion, I've already been disqualified. Nothing to see here ladies and gentlemen. Just move along.
Once we got beyond the interrogation phase, I thought the conversational grass became somewhat greener between us.
Here's the GR version of the new essay you included in the intro to our conversation. Thanks for including in your comments."
Caitlin Johnstone, However Bad You Think Israel Is, It's Worse
"The IDF has been running a Telegram channel featuring homemade snuff films in which Gazans are brutally murdered by Israeli forces, captioned with celebrations of the gore and pain therein like “Burning their mother… You won’t believe the video we got! You can hear their bones crunch.” The IDF had previously denied any association with the channel, but Haaretz now reports that it was directly run by an IDF psychological warfare unit."
Good work. You "think" elections are rigged? "Most elections these days are rigged. There are many well-established means of doing this cheating. One of the main techniques is through the exploitation of hackable systems of digital vote counting. Another common feature is the sabotage of elections by well-orchestrated networks of large media cartels."
Fuck, Anthony. Money. $. Media is $$. You think Carnegie was just a guy with no power, no influence?
Money, booze runners, cigarette runners, the entire cartel of casino capitalism.
Capitalism is all about cheating, and 21st century hacking by the Jews of Israel or Jews of Little Tel Aviv, come on, brother.
Entire countries are the outcome of cheating, treaty making and treaty breaking. Why the hell would elections be immunde from a Sucker is Born Every Nanosecond SMoke and Mirrors Snake Oil Salesmen?
Boss Tweed looks like Fred ROgers today compared to these pollitical and economic and media hitmen/women:
Tammany Hall, also known as the Society of St. Tammany, the Sons of St. Tammany, or the Columbian Order, was an American political organization founded in 1786 and incorporated on May 12, 1789, as the Tammany Society.
According to GOP Congressman ( Florida ) Brian Mast
Dead Palestinian babies aren't all that innocent.
He believes that Palestinian babies are not innocent civilians but "terrorists" who should be killed.
Mast made the horrifying comment when confronted by Code Pink protesters outside his office on Wednesday.
In a video Mast can be seen calmly telling the demonstrators. "It would be better if you kill all the terrorists and kill everyone who are supporters.
When asked if he has seen the babies killed in Israeli attacks, Mast says, " These are not innocent Palestinian civilians.
The babies ? " the activist asks in astonishment.
Mast then says that the "half a million people starving to death" should have elected a pro Israel government.
Hmmm... isn't that what was said about the 3million civilians bombed to death in Germany.
When one protester points out that much of Gaza's infrastructure has been destroyed, Mast says," And there's more that needs to be destroyed. Did you hear me? There's more that needs to be destroyed, he said again for emphasis.
Why do I bring this to the table. To point out that this is the thinking, belief and nature of many Israeli Jews, and above all that total lack of empathy to the suffering of others, let anything happen to Jewish sensibilities however and listen to the cries of anguish. It is a nature alien to most gentiles and it is important to make note of that distinction. It therefore is impossible and silly for a gentile to attempt to affect the thinking or behaviour of a hateful Jew by conversation, no matter how logical that might be. The true masters of all humanity have counted on this for centuries as they turned everything upside down and confounded the minds and souls of all gentiles.
Almost every great thinker throughout recorded time has lived by a code of self restraint, of truth to self and others as a foundation for living a life worth living in any so called civilization which by its nature is fraught with faults. A life worth living is only possible where the stage is set for it to flourish. That stage is one of rules and laws which go beyond the norms of civility and actively protect said life worth living.
So do we go on.. every man for himself a sure fire road to zero. Or do we unite.. small at first ( the core of formulation and principle ) then larger groups until we can no longer be ignored, until due to our strength and principles we no longer ask we simply take, because that is our right as a people. As in take away the corrupt power bloc that has ruled the country for decades.
WBJ.
Good article, apart from this
“Then on January 26 the ICJ came out with a historic ruling that acknowledged that a plausible instance of genocide was occurring in Gaza. The court did not order a cease fire. According to Michel Chossudovsky, the Court opted rather to call on the Netanyahu government to prevent and punish itself for possibly committing genocide.”
The ICJ called for the end of the killings and of all action which may result in harm for the Palestinian people.
In other words, it did called for a cease fire.
They did not use the term ceasefire, but in their written decision, using the technical terminology related to their convention, they did.
“Ceasefire” is is just the word used for the madia spin.
Advise you read this article which explains in details from a legal point of view what the ICJ decision say.
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2024/01/has-international-law-survived-or-has-the-western-political-class-killed-it/
Also the court did not told the government to investigate them selfs, that is a job for the Supreme court of israel, and not by “politicians”.
Also, taking israel propaganda quotes about the court judgment, as legit should ring some bells in your head.
Professor Chossudovsky, may be a great economist but not a lawyer
Here is more from Gaza
https://mywisdom.substack.com/p/sos-gaza
Here's is my comment which came up on some of these issues I discussed via radio. It came up when I was a guest with Dr. Kevin Barrett on his Substack, Kevin's Newsletter
https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/anthony-hall-on-israeli-reaction
From Hall
"That's too flippant and misleading Kevin. When we discussed the genocide party animals on your show, and I didn't go along with your easy peesy narrative. You wanted to correct me, not converse with me in a constructive fashion about the news that I was looking into concerning Prof. Chossudovsky's critique of the ICJ ruling.
I specifically explained that I had at that point read Chossudovsky but had not yet read to source documents. So I indicated I would hold back from going deeper in an analysis until I had done more homework. That's different than folding because I didn't have a good answer to your question." What was your.... oh so good question... for which I apparently didn't have a good answer? Rather than engaging in debate and then declaring yourself to be the winner, back up a bit. At least tell me the content of the good question I couldn't, or chose not to answer. After all I'm a volunteer doing a public service, not an applicant for a job or a student doing a test.
Hi John Scrivener. Welcome to the discussion. OK. Now I know how you read my psychology. It looks like a reasonable possibility. This whole subject about what to do about a genocide right in our face every day, can have a depressive effect. But now that you have come up with your diagnosis of my mental state, what about contributing to the substance of issue at hand. Any thoughts outside the ad hominem realm on the substance of the ICJ ruling and on various responses to it?
Prof. Chossudovsky is incredibly productive, far reaching, and deep digging in his activist scholarship. He deserves some respect and consideration Kevin. To me he is an exemplary illustration of a senior academic keeping up with the news as a tenacious activist scholar. How many like him are around? Maybe my bias as a Canadian is a factor here.
My first encounter with Michel was when he accepted my essay after our Edmonton presentation in 2008. "The Lies and Crimes of 9/11" is still published on my archive at GR.ca. You may not be aware John that I gave my first 9/11 paper at the Stanley E Milner Library in Edmonton, sharing the podium with Kevin. Kevin was then riding the wave of his fame as the Fox New's favourite evil Muslim... and a traitor to boot.
Its too early to shut down open debate on the ICJ ruling. It seems, however, everything that needs to be decided on the World Court's role has already been decided here on Kevin's newsletter. Or if there is to be a discussion, I've already been disqualified. Nothing to see here ladies and gentlemen. Just move along.
Once we got beyond the interrogation phase, I thought the conversational grass became somewhat greener between us.
Here's the GR version of the new essay you included in the intro to our conversation. Thanks for including in your comments."
https://www.globalresearch.ca/turning-corner-away-genocide-criminality-inherent-rules-based-international-order/5848770
Caitlin Johnstone, However Bad You Think Israel Is, It's Worse
"The IDF has been running a Telegram channel featuring homemade snuff films in which Gazans are brutally murdered by Israeli forces, captioned with celebrations of the gore and pain therein like “Burning their mother… You won’t believe the video we got! You can hear their bones crunch.” The IDF had previously denied any association with the channel, but Haaretz now reports that it was directly run by an IDF psychological warfare unit."
https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/however-bad-you-think-israel-is-its
Good work. You "think" elections are rigged? "Most elections these days are rigged. There are many well-established means of doing this cheating. One of the main techniques is through the exploitation of hackable systems of digital vote counting. Another common feature is the sabotage of elections by well-orchestrated networks of large media cartels."
Fuck, Anthony. Money. $. Media is $$. You think Carnegie was just a guy with no power, no influence?
Money, booze runners, cigarette runners, the entire cartel of casino capitalism.
Capitalism is all about cheating, and 21st century hacking by the Jews of Israel or Jews of Little Tel Aviv, come on, brother.
Entire countries are the outcome of cheating, treaty making and treaty breaking. Why the hell would elections be immunde from a Sucker is Born Every Nanosecond SMoke and Mirrors Snake Oil Salesmen?
Yep.
Richard is hot today. Scroll down.
https://paulokirk.substack.com/p/oh-the-c-word-or-the-q-word-or-the
+--+
Boss Tweed looks like Fred ROgers today compared to these pollitical and economic and media hitmen/women:
Tammany Hall, also known as the Society of St. Tammany, the Sons of St. Tammany, or the Columbian Order, was an American political organization founded in 1786 and incorporated on May 12, 1789, as the Tammany Society.
Excellent, incisive, unbiased analysis