Canada's Parliamentary Disgrace
Is Canada Under Trudeau and Singh Becoming a Safe Haven for Extremists, Terrorists, and organized Crime?
All members of all parties in the Parliament of Canada joined forces to demonstrate dramatically what a wayward and degraded place my country has become. So far George Galloway, a former British MP who is one of the most skilled rhetoricians of the English language presently alive today, seems to have found suitable words for the outrage that has taken place.
Galloways predicts that September 22 will long be recognized as a “Day of Infamy” for Canada, a day when “a grotesque rewriting of Canadian history” has taken place. One of the most humiliating moments ever in our country occurred after 12 shameful moments when our parliamentarians gave twelve standing ovations to the the peepee-piano-playing Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky. Then came the episode that would demonstrate the depths of dishonour that is making Canada’s Parliament a symbol of sabotage by our disgraced MPs. Said Galloway,
“In this paroxysm of fervour the Speaker of the House of Commons [Antony Rota] drew attention to a Canadian-Ukrainian hero [in the gallery] who had fought the Russians in World War II. As the parliamentarians rose as one man and one woman to applaud Yaroslav Hunka, aged 98, did the words, “fought the Russians,” not ring even the smallest of bells in the thickest of skulls among the maniacs on their feet applauding with North Korean levels of vivacity the man who had fought the Russians in World War II.
Did it not come to them that they were on the same side as the Russians in World War II… that Canada, that Britain, that America and Russia were allies during World War II? So how can you feverishly applaud a man who the speaker of the House introduces as someone who fought the Russians during World War II?
Even if you don’t know that he was Yaroslav Hunka of the 14th division of the same SS that murdered Canadian prisoners in the dunes on the beach of Juno in Normandy in 1945… even if they didn’t realize that the Galacian SS, of which Yaroslav Hunka was a member and from which he is a fugitive from war crimes charges… why did it not occur to them that this man was part of war crimes almost beyond imagination.”
In the video above see especially 8 minutes to 22 minutes of Galloway’s Commentary on the Day of Infamy in Canada’s Disgraced Parliament
Many are trying, rather pathetically, to make partisan hay out of what has transpired. There is, however, no up side for this ugly parliamentary fiasco. In my view the episode serves to underline the more general failure of Parliament to represent the authentic diversity of the Canadian people, and our varied opinions in spite of all the WOK emphasis on fake “inclusivity.”
The favouritism extended to friends of the government. This favouritism became especially pronounced after the events in 2020 opened the door to dictatorship through unjustified emergency measures. Suddenly the protections of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms were deemed by our politicized judges to be “moot” as dissent continues to be criminalized by the predatory mobsters that seek to gain added control over our culled and enfeebled populations
The marked failure is conspicuous in all parties in Parliament that failed to host public events presenting opposing perspectives on the Covidian fiasco. Parliament did not attend to Canadians by creating assemblies of experts such as those put together by Senator Ron Johnson in the US Congress or by Christina Anderson in the European Parliament.
Indeed the disorientation and disarray that gripped all MPS on 22 Sept. was anticipated by Poilievre’s decision last February to give into the pressure applied by the Centre for Jewish and Israel Affairs (CIJA) on the Leader of the Opposition. Poilievre fell in line with the CIJA’s ultimatum. At the risk of bad media coverage Poilievre condemned Anderson’s visit to Canada as a guest of the Freedom Convoy.
Instead of embracing a leading European critic of Trudeau’s dictatorial policies, Poilievre gave in to the command to depict Anderson as a “nazi” who is not welcome in this country. Now a member of the National Socialist movement in Ukraine and Canada has been given the red carpet treatment even though Yaroslav Hunka was introduced by the Speaker of the House of Commons as a man who fought against Canada’s Soviet and Russian allies.
Poilievre is as guilty as the other 337 MPs in Parliament. He joined his parliamentary peers in going so bonkers for Canadian war mongering that the elected reps just plain forgot that our country fought with Russia in opposing Hitlerian forces during WWII. Now it seems Canada’s leaders are embracing along with the rest of NATO the Hitlerian legacy of fighting Russia. That kind of amnesia displayed by our law makers, including Poilivre, is indicative of the the moral and intellectual impoverishment which is engulfing Canada during these years when the Trudeau-Jagmeet Singh alliance forms the basis of national governance.
George Galloway’s commentary gives the lie to Poilivre’s complaint. Poilievre has asserted
“No parliamentarians (other than Justin Trudeau) had the opportunity to vet this individual’s past before he was introduced and honoured on the floor of the House of Commons. Without warning or context, it was impossible for any parliamentarian in the room (other than Mr. Trudeau) to know of this dark past. Mr. Trudeau must personally apologize and avoid passing the blame to others as he always does.”
I did not see a single individual staying in his or her seat in the videos recording the infamous standing ovation. Unless Poilievre stayed sitting, he must assume his own share of the blame for his participation in the mass failure to remember who were Canada’s friends and enemies during World War II.
Canada’s Parliamentary Disgrace Merges With the Trudeau-Singh Scandal Concerning Hardeep Nijjars Military Quest to Use Canada as a Platform to Bring About Khalistani Independence
The national disgrace in Canada’s Parliament was explained in detail by journalists in India. They have been following closely the contention raised by the government of Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India, that Canada under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is becoming “a safe haven for extremists, terrorists, and organized crime.” After laying out the fiaso engulfing the Canadian Parliament, Arindam Bagchi put on record a devastating critique of what is currently going on in Trudeau’s circle of war mongering officials. OpIndia reported
“India called Canada a ‘safe haven’ for terrorists and gangsters, OpIndia
On 21st September, the Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson, Arindam Bagchi, said that Canada has a growing reputation as a safe haven for terrorists, extremists, and organised crime. Taking a strong stance on Canada for its inaction against the criminals even after sharing the information, and making an important remark on the current diplomatic issue, Arindam Bagchi said, “If you’re talking about reputational issues and reputational damage, if there’s any country that needs to look at this, I think it is Canada and its growing reputation as a place, as a safe haven for terrorists, for extremists, and for organized crime. And I think that’s a country that needs to worry about its international reputation.”
He added, “Safe haven is being provided in Canada, we want the Canadian govt to not do so and take action against those who have terrorism charges or send them here to face justice. We’ve sought either extradition request or assistance related to that, at least more than 20-25 individuals we’ve requested over the years, but the response has not been helpful at all.”
The diplomatic relations between India and Canada have been severely strained due to the Canadian government’s expulsion of a top Indian diplomat on 19th September. The expulsion followed an inquiry into the killing of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau considers Nijjar to be a “Canadian citizen” and suspects the involvement of “agents of the Indian government” in his murder despite lacking evidence. In retaliation, the Indian government expelled a Canadian diplomat. Amid the ongoing diplomatic tensions, the Canadian High Commission in India has announced a temporary adjustment in its staff presence and has requested security for its diplomats and consular officers in India. These actions have created a significant diplomatic controversy even though Canada had previously made baseless allegations.”
The disgrace in the Canadian Parliament is rightfully merging into the stream of allegations that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has been “looking the other way” as Canada became a main recruiting and training site for the Tiger Force, a well armed Sikh militia preparing in Canada for the application of armed coercion in creating an independent Khalistan. The goal of creating an independent Khalistan is shared by Jagmeet Singh who is absolutely instrumental in maintaining a parliamentary majority for Trudeau’s minority government.
The top Khalistani Commando of the Tiger Force was Nardeep Nijjar. Nijjar was killed in Surrey British Columbia in June. Trudeau used the Canadian Parliament to accuse the government of India of murdering Nijjar as if he was a regular Canadian citizen. The government of India is developing a major case that Canada is deeply implicated in helping many members of the Khalistani independence movement to avoid many criminal allegations and convictions. Among those implicated are Mandeep Singh, Gajindar Singh, Moninder Singh Bual, Avtar Singh Narwal and Talwinder Parmar.
Rather than dealing with the heavily documented case that Nijjar was viewed by the Indian government as a separatist terrorist charged with many crimes, the government of Canada repeatedly ignored without explanation all the evidence provided to back up the repeated requests to extradite the Khalistani Commando to India. The case against Nijjar is laid out in elaborate detail by the news reader in the following video produced by News 18 channel. Although the reader’s accent may take some getting used to, the fact remains that he lays out a very comprehensive indictment that must be answered by our war mongering Canadian Prime Minister.
Trudeau openly boasts that he provides lucrative bribes to Canada’s notoriously corrupt and censored media establishment.
As this latest round of scandal escalates, the thugs running the big media outlets are acting true to form in blocking Canadians from the kind of decent reporting they would need to understand the factual basis of the breakdown in Canada-India relations. The media has played an especially big role in brainwashing Canada’s parliamentarians, whose political careers revolve around getting positive news coverage. Most politicians simply act out scripts written for them by media operatives and handlers.
For the most part our media determine, shape and police the adherence of our public officials to permissible public discourse. This stifling media control, forms an essential aspect of the fiasco that engulfed Parliament on 22 September. It has been very clear to observers that media disinformation operatives have down played the National Socialist features of the government put in charge of the Ukraine in 2014, by Jewish neoconservatives such as Victoria Nuland of the US State Department. This media contortion in the rewriting of history must have been a major factor in the genesis of the disgraceful spectacle of Canadian MP’s simply forgetting that Canada and Russia allied together in opposing Hitler’s Armed Forces.
This forgetfulness is not accidental but it has been encouraged to downplay the reality that NATO is building on it long inheritance of embracing many facets of the legacy of National Socialism throughout the Cold War and into the so-called Global War on Terror. George Galloway’s dramatic presentation of the Canada’s parliamentary travesty emphasized the role of the families of those Canadian soldiers that were killed or wounded in opposing Hitlerian National Socialism. Galloway emphasized the importance of bringing forward the memory of the 100,000 soldiers killed or wounded by the German Armed Forces in the World War II.
My father, Major James Jamison Hall, was badly wounded by German soldiers in WWII. When I referred as a boy to those that shot my father as “nazis,” a term of insult invented by Hitler’s communist enemies, my father corrected me. He told me that most German soldiers were not members of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. In looking back at his explanation I think he was encouraging me to look beyond propaganda to see the complexity and nuances necessary for relating of accurate history. Below is a photograph of my father and I in the 1950s when my dad kept up his soldiering in the Irish Regiment of Toronto Canada.
Generally I find myself agreeing with the Israel Lobby organizations in Canada that have expressed abhorance at the spectacle of Canadian parliamentarians giving a universal standing ovation to Yaroslav Hunka. As Michael Mostyn of B’nai Brith Canada observed, “how could this possibly have taken place at the centre of Canadian democracy?” The Centre for the Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) explained its consternation as follows: “Canada’s Jewish community stands firmly with Ukraine in its war against Russian aggression. But we can’t stay silent when crimes committed by Ukrainians during the Holocaust are whitewashed.”
There has so far been no opening for a proper debate in Canada on whether Canada should be allied with Russia or Ukraine or if it should assert its neutrality in the style of Switzerland. I have written repeatedly that it is not in Canada’s interest to go to war with Russia. [for reference click on underlined section]
Why Shouldn’t Canada Withdraw from NATO to Pursue Peace With Russia?
As the first and second largest countries in the world, Canada and Russia share many characteristics. Russia and Canada are sparsely settled lands with vast and diverse natural resources. Our natural resource wealth is coveted especially by those trying to hold together a bankrupted banking system that thrives on creating massive wars along with spiralling debts. In Canada and Russia we both have to learn to make the best of winter in the coldest arctic countries on earth. We are arctic neighbours sharing a norther border.
We share a preoccupation with hockey.
Moreover many in Canada appreciate that Russia is a Christian country with a fairly widespread aversion to the kind of WOKE politics that we are seeing in Canadian public schools. These schools are hastily being transformed without proper discussion, debate and negotiation into platforms for experiments in the transgender transformation of young people.
Some in Canada do not support the toppling of the elected Ukrainian government in 2014 to put together a leadership composed of Jewish plutocrats such as Igor Kolomoiski with military and political agencies aligned with the SS inheritance of, say, the notorious Azov Battalion.
Some of us in Canada do not take well to seeing our big-spending government, that has built up more debt than all previous governments combined, sinking $ billion into a country well known for dark deeds like human trafficking of children, organ sales, money laundering and the selling of armaments in various black markets. Some of the illicit business is dealing Canada and Canadians into Ukraine’s notoriously rotten underground economy.
Rather than propping up the Zelensky’s money vacuuming enterprises, many thoughtful Canadians want to know what we are getting into by making Ukraine a military priority. We want to know much more, for instance, about the elaborate Ukrainian complex of bioweapon laboratories built up by the patrons of freakish apparatus of Pentagon “biodefense.”
The Jewish organizations such as the CIJA, B’nai Brith Canada, and the Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies are right to ask serious questions about what went on in Parliament to bring about such a debacle that will certainly wreak havoc on Canada’s international reputation. Beyond that recognition, however, Canada’s Israel Lobby has a lot to account for. Why are these supposed human rights philanthropes so dedicated to keeping the war with Russia going no matter how severe the consequences for the weakest side in this confrontation, which, so far at least, is definitely Ukraine?
What has Russia done to harm Canada? Why stay with a discredited and obsolete agency like NATO that should have been folded up and ended at the end of the Cold War.
What do Canada’s Jewish agencies have to say about NATO’s aggressions on Russia that went into high gear in 2014? Why was it that Russia’s government declared its mission to “denazify” Ukraine in 2022. Shouldn’t such a subject come up for discussion in schools, in the media, or on the floors of legislatures, parliaments and Congress?
More than any other power on earth, doesn’t Russia have the most extensive experience of opposing National Socialism? Why shouldn’t Russia emphasize their history as the primary polity that defeated Hitlerian National Socialism? What role have the Jewish agencies and the media venues in avoiding some reckoning with hard questions about nazification and denazification, then and now. Doesn’t this failure in public education have a lot to do with why Canada’s Members of Parliament have become very confused or utterly clueless concerning WWII history.
The Lobby’s complaints about the actions of the Yaroslav Hunka and his fellow soldiers in the murder of Jewish victims, leaves aside that Waffen SS forces drawn from Ukraine also made Poles, Czechs, Slovaks and partisan Soviets targets of their attempted ethnic cleansing. Why is the life and death of some kind of people valued and elevated more highly than other kinds of people?
In assigning responsibility for the fog of war surrounding our history and our institutions, what more is to be said about media bias and the wholesale censorship in which our biggest communications venues presently engage? The harnessing of public opinion to support SS organizations in Ukraine, has not been the subject to proper open debate in permitted public discourse.
What political parties would risk offending their patrons by developing formal ties with those like myself seeking peace with Russia as well as Canada’s withdrawal from NATO. No, there’s no room in Parliament or in the media or in the top-down governance of our universities to look objectively at the reasons and prospects of NATO-Russia warfare as well as an expanding array of other topics.
Why is that? What is the reach of the ignorance, stupidity and single-minded conformity put on global display in the Canadian Parliament? When will we start to deal seriously with the valid observation that Canada is becoming a safe haven for extremists, terrorists, and organized crime?
Again another thoughtful and excellent engaging essay. It is difficult to comment properly at this time as I wipe my tears. Maybe later.
Crystia Freeland’s grandfather a nazi collaborator in Ukraine - there’s one answer.
Poliviere is a fop who hid behind CPC skirts all during covid and just came out now as a closet freedom fighter? And then stands to clap. 🤦♀️
And WTF is Canada doing getting involved with the Khalistan problem?? Deport their asses. When ya immigrate to Canada ya leave that shit behind, isn’t that why you left in the first place?