5 Comments

Exactly!

Expand full comment

Thanks for your interest and support, J. Michael Springman

Expand full comment

Some follow-up:

​ ​ Tucker Carlson's first Twitter broadcast went mega-viral Tuesday night, racking up 71.6 million views in less than 24 hours.

During the 10 minute monologue, Carlson slammed Ukraine war mongers, and took the media to task for ignoring the "bombshell of the millennium" in which a government whistleblower revealed that craft developed by non-human intelligence has been recovered by governments around the world.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tucker-carlsons-twitter-debut-goes-mega-viral-crushes-ratings-while-taylor-lorenz-makes

Fox News notified former show host Tucker Carlson that his new independent program published via Twitter violates his contract with the network, US media reported, citing a copy of a letter from Fox to Carlson’s attorneys... “In connection with such breach and pursuant to the Agreement, Fox expressly reserves all rights and remedies which are available to it at law or equity,” the letter said, as quoted in the report.

..Carlson’s legal team objects to Fox’s efforts to block the new program, arguing that Twitter as a platform is not in direct competition with Fox, the report said, citing a source familiar with their thinking. Another source familiar with the matter reportedly said that Fox executives told Carlson that the network intends to keep him sidelined until 2025. Any legal action by Fox would violate Carlson’s First Amendment rights to freedom of speech under the US Constitution, his lawyers reportedly said...

..Carlson was reportedly removed from the Fox News lineup as part of a settlement agreement with Dominion Voting Systems.

https://sputnikglobe.com/20230608/reports-fox-claims-tucker-carlson-violated-contract-by-airing-independent-twitter-show-1110994478.html

Expand full comment

Was Carlson removed from FOX by Larry Fink at BlackRock?

I noticed 9/11 appeared on Tucker's twitter list of things you are not supposed to ask questions about publicly. Remember in his preppy days Tucker was rude and crudely dismissive of his distinguished guest, Prof. David Ray Griffin. Prof. Griffin's eleven scholarly books debunked every aspect of the official narrative of 9/11. These books and its now departed author are legendary among those high up in the intellectual food chain of discerning thinkers and commentators. Will Tucker join us?

Carlson has up until now gone along with the official narrative that is the cover story for the audacious 911 psy op. He goes farther yet. Like Chris Hedges and Chomsky and Matt Taibbi and many, many more. Tucker has condemned and dismissed as flakes anyone who doesn't pledge allegiance to the media chorus introduced to the public on the very morning of 9/11 by a former Israeli prime minister. Has something changed since Tucker left network TV?

In my view its is necessary to understand how 9/11 put in place a system for vandalizing the rule of law with the type of emergency measures that were taken to even a more subversive level in the course of the manufactured COVID crisis.

Expand full comment

I am sure there is hope for Tucker.

He went to the Kennedy Assassination by the CIA. It's just a hop to 9/11, right?

I posted this today, pertinent to your 9/11 comments:

Rule by Decree: The Emergency State’s Plot to Override the Constitution​ (Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney began revision of​ ​ "​C​ontinuity of Government" plans under Jerry Ford, and resumed under Reagan/Bush. They were activated on 9/11/01​ with VP Cheney in the driver's seat​.)

​The seeds of this ongoing madness were sown several decades ago when George W. Bush stealthily issued two presidential directives that granted the president the power to unilaterally declare a national emergency, which is loosely defined as “any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions.“ Comprising the country’s Continuity of Government (COG) plan, these directives (National Security Presidential Directive 51 and Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20), which do not need congressional approval, provide a skeletal outline of the actions the president will take in the event of a “national emergency.”

​ ​Just what sort of actions the president will take once he declares a national emergency can barely be discerned from the barebones directives. However, one thing is clear: in the event of a national emergency, the COG directives give unchecked executive, legislative and judicial power to the president. The country would then be subjected to martial law by default, and the Constitution and the Bill of Rights would be suspended.​..

​...​All of the imperial powers amassed by Obama, Bush, Trump and now Biden—to kill American citizens without due process, to detain suspects (including American citizens) indefinitely, to strip Americans of their citizenship rights, to carry out mass surveillance on Americans without probable cause, to wage wars without congressional authorization, to suspend laws during wartime, to disregard laws with which he might disagree, to conduct secret wars and convene secret courts, to sanction torture, to sidestep the legislatures and courts with executive orders and signing statements, to direct the military to operate beyond the reach of the law, to establish a standing army on American soil, to operate a shadow government, to declare national emergencies for any manipulated reason, and to act as a dictator and a tyrant, above the law and beyond any real accountability—have become a permanent part of the president’s toolbox of terror.

https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/rule_by_decree_the_emergency_states_plot_to_override_the_constitution

Expand full comment