Is there a link to your disagreement with the NCI, Professor? I'd like to know more about the NCI which I had always believed to be another strawman argument. Why not put those lawyers to better use by actually laying criminal charges against the directors who administered the illegal mandates and also against the individual nurses and doctors who gave the deadly gene therapy shots?
The NCI invited me to give evidence, then withdrew the request creating an unpleasant situation in the Saskatoon event. R.B. Ham was with me as it happened. Don't get me wrong, the NCI has done much good work chronicling and documenting many very important things. But the NCI too decided, for whatever reason, not to go into certain issues so all their talk about MSM censorship, valid and important as it is, leaves unaddressed what the NCI chose to censor and why they did so.
Did "certain issues" include nanotechnology biosensors embedded in masks, tests and mRNA GENE THERAPY jabs for surveillance under the skin via the Internet of Bio-Nano Things and the WBAN (Wireless Body Area Network IEEE802.15.6)?
Who directed the global operation at the highest levels. The role of finance and such.
Your list was hardly touched on as far as I know. Karen Kingston comes to mind. I try not to use the "gene therapy" phrase. Nothing about genetic modification in preparation for AI-driven transhumanism is "therapeutic" as far as I know. "Surveillance under the skin." Yes. Hugely important To this day I'm not aware of the NCI dealing in a consultative way with its own censoring.
There’s a lot here to digest here. I’m continually amazed by the awareness shown by these conversations. I’m starting to see all these events in what I can only describe as an “ecology of brutal mendacity”. That being said, I’m puzzled by Professor Hall’s mechanistic analogy describing these momentous times as “gears”. While this appears as an internal contradiction, it may simply serve as an example of how we’ve been brainwashed by buying into language that misrepresents, and thereby undermines however slightly, what we stand for and what we mean.
"If you read the papers you may see History In The Making..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNTc1eqXIz0
Is there a link to your disagreement with the NCI, Professor? I'd like to know more about the NCI which I had always believed to be another strawman argument. Why not put those lawyers to better use by actually laying criminal charges against the directors who administered the illegal mandates and also against the individual nurses and doctors who gave the deadly gene therapy shots?
The NCI invited me to give evidence, then withdrew the request creating an unpleasant situation in the Saskatoon event. R.B. Ham was with me as it happened. Don't get me wrong, the NCI has done much good work chronicling and documenting many very important things. But the NCI too decided, for whatever reason, not to go into certain issues so all their talk about MSM censorship, valid and important as it is, leaves unaddressed what the NCI chose to censor and why they did so.
Did "certain issues" include nanotechnology biosensors embedded in masks, tests and mRNA GENE THERAPY jabs for surveillance under the skin via the Internet of Bio-Nano Things and the WBAN (Wireless Body Area Network IEEE802.15.6)?
If not which ones?
Who directed the global operation at the highest levels. The role of finance and such.
Your list was hardly touched on as far as I know. Karen Kingston comes to mind. I try not to use the "gene therapy" phrase. Nothing about genetic modification in preparation for AI-driven transhumanism is "therapeutic" as far as I know. "Surveillance under the skin." Yes. Hugely important To this day I'm not aware of the NCI dealing in a consultative way with its own censoring.
nonvaxer420 is Canadian. His research is excellent.
https://rumble.com/v6tranf-412779435.html
There’s a lot here to digest here. I’m continually amazed by the awareness shown by these conversations. I’m starting to see all these events in what I can only describe as an “ecology of brutal mendacity”. That being said, I’m puzzled by Professor Hall’s mechanistic analogy describing these momentous times as “gears”. While this appears as an internal contradiction, it may simply serve as an example of how we’ve been brainwashed by buying into language that misrepresents, and thereby undermines however slightly, what we stand for and what we mean.
Good point about gears. Gears of a planned destruction maybe?
wish people would remember to activiate ' cc ' for subtitles. So much easier to follow